23 Responses

  1. ramizi at | | Reply

    there are more things awkward about this picture than just the length! :) it looks like she’s wearing wierd white hospital srubs…the shoes are terrible in the pale/white/blush color…again proof that money cannot buy you style.

  2. Glitzy.Apple at | | Reply

    waoooo….. that looks really baaaad.

    the bag and shoes are amazing, the dress is strictly ok. thats one awful combination.

  3. m at | | Reply

    OH MY GOD.. attending AGELESS luncheon..looking totally AGED.. AND AGED LOOK AND AGED BAG…
    what a waste of pretty face.. $$$$$$$$ again proves… self proclaimed fashiionistas have wacko fashion sense

  4. Pamela at | | Reply

    Can’t stand her fashion sense.No wonder Vogue only focused on her Lieber collection for their article on her.”We will not mention the Cavalli collection.”

  5. Malavika at | | Reply

    Is that a birkin?

    1. Payal(HHC) at | | Reply


  6. Roni at | | Reply

    horrible shoes….

  7. Amy at | | Reply

    As matronly as it gets!!!

  8. KK at | | Reply

    HAHA.. That’s a totally ridiculous outfit. I love m’s comment – attending an ageless luncheon looking AGED! HAHAHAH

  9. Bsimple at | | Reply

    Okay…did she rub beetroot on her face before showing up???? and those tackayyyy red nails… that has to be the weirdest idea of injecting color in a neutral outfit….ughh >_<

  10. pan at | | Reply

    she really has no clue does she? PROOVES MONEY CANT BUY YOU FASHION SENSE LET ALONE STYLE BABY!!!!

  11. Kiwi at | | Reply

    So sad-she is pretty-but the dress, bag and shoes all together look ghastly.
    Bsimple-she ALWAYS wears red nail polish-never seen any other colour on her hands/toes

  12. tina at | | Reply

    Ugh, these people need to get over their obsession with Birkins. They can’t dress at all and then show off with that bag.

    Even if I could afford a Birkin, I wouldn’t want one just to separate myself from these crazy ladies like Anu Deewan and this woman.

  13. genie at | | Reply

    her legs are sooo fair, i thought she’s wearing stockings :P
    she looks like an old hostel warden!!the working middle aged women of Bombay do skirt-blouse’s way much stylishly than her ;)

  14. alive'n'kicking at | | Reply

    she was chosen as a fashion idol by some mag i guess…weird!

  15. preeths at | | Reply

    i almost mistook her for a nun in the all white attire :O

  16. Adit at | | Reply

    she is such a lovely girl, what happened, very awkward lenght of dress. in fact I hate her dress and her shoes.

  17. Genie at | | Reply

    A nurse’s cap missing to complete the Nurse look
    :-/….anyone for “regain-from-white-overdose” injection : )

  18. akaa at | | Reply

    What is that ?? .. like seriously!!
    It’s all wrong from head to toe …Even the Birkin in this color looks bad (blasphemy .. I know!!)
    It may be because of her wierd get-up. Or may be , she makes it look bad, along with those already wierd Loubs,

  19. Lalitha at | | Reply

    Her ensemble leaves much to be desired. Where do I start–the horrid patterns of the dress, the nurse-like white of the birkin or the heels? Somehow when I look at this picture, I am reminded of an ostrich!

  20. mj at | | Reply

    very mother of the bride, circa 1982…what was she thinking? love someone’s comment on looking “aged” at the “ageless” luncheon…which BTW is quite an ageist event…weren’t mags like Vogue supposed to sell fabulous at any age rather than being ageless????????

  21. nelly at | | Reply

    The dress looks like it’s made out of grandma’s lace curtains, she totally ruined the shoes and Bag on that ugly dress!

  22. bo at | | Reply

    hideous! should she even be at a vogue lunch!

Leave a Reply