Shoe Spotting!

Comment image 23

To begin with, these aren’t the easiest sandals to pull off… Teamed with that awkward length dress, Sonia killed any chance she might have otherwise had!


Left: Sonia Garware At Vogue Age(less) Luncheon
Right: Christian Louboutin Mount Street Satin Sandals

  • Like it? Share it!


  1. there are more things awkward about this picture than just the length! 🙂 it looks like she’s wearing wierd white hospital srubs…the shoes are terrible in the pale/white/blush color…again proof that money cannot buy you style.

  2. waoooo….. that looks really baaaad.

    the bag and shoes are amazing, the dress is strictly ok. thats one awful combination.

  3. OH MY GOD.. attending AGELESS luncheon..looking totally AGED.. AND AGED LOOK AND AGED BAG…
    what a waste of pretty face.. $$$$$$$$ again proves… self proclaimed fashiionistas have wacko fashion sense

  4. Can’t stand her fashion sense.No wonder Vogue only focused on her Lieber collection for their article on her.”We will not mention the Cavalli collection.”

  5. Okay…did she rub beetroot on her face before showing up???? and those tackayyyy red nails… that has to be the weirdest idea of injecting color in a neutral outfit….ughh >_<

  6. So sad-she is pretty-but the dress, bag and shoes all together look ghastly.
    Bsimple-she ALWAYS wears red nail polish-never seen any other colour on her hands/toes

  7. Ugh, these people need to get over their obsession with Birkins. They can’t dress at all and then show off with that bag.

    Even if I could afford a Birkin, I wouldn’t want one just to separate myself from these crazy ladies like Anu Deewan and this woman.

  8. her legs are sooo fair, i thought she’s wearing stockings 😛
    she looks like an old hostel warden!!the working middle aged women of Bombay do skirt-blouse’s way much stylishly than her 😉

  9. What is that ?? .. like seriously!!
    It’s all wrong from head to toe …Even the Birkin in this color looks bad (blasphemy .. I know!!)
    It may be because of her wierd get-up. Or may be , she makes it look bad, along with those already wierd Loubs,

  10. Her ensemble leaves much to be desired. Where do I start–the horrid patterns of the dress, the nurse-like white of the birkin or the heels? Somehow when I look at this picture, I am reminded of an ostrich!

  11. very mother of the bride, circa 1982…what was she thinking? love someone’s comment on looking “aged” at the “ageless” luncheon…which BTW is quite an ageist event…weren’t mags like Vogue supposed to sell fabulous at any age rather than being ageless????????


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *