31 Responses

  1. Violet at | | Reply

    This is a bad look. The top looks messy and the fit seems to be off. The hair and the eye make up too is unflattering! This is not a princess-y look!

  2. Malaise at | | Reply

    I don’t get princess-y from this look. I get a missing ‘candle and eerie music in the background’ vibe.

    1. whteve at | | Reply

      wht pricess-y look? kuch bhi…this comment i agree with kinda :)

    2. uttu at | | Reply

      Agree with you. The look is too ghost like!

    3. rs at | | Reply

      LOL. ROTFL

    4. sree at | | Reply

      YES! Very Bhoot-like.

  3. Ramya at | | Reply

    P n p , ideally this should be categorized as WT hey ….. Nothing absolutely is working . I mean look at the beautiful bottom half , it dint have to be crowded by that neckline .

  4. Niv at | | Reply

    This is more WTH than princessy !

  5. whteve at | | Reply

    no comment on the “vidya balan” wedges? ppl have been torn to pieces over wearing them. bias is an unbecoming color on u, guys

    1. sara at | | Reply


    2. J_Street at | | Reply


  6. nisha b at | | Reply

    Is she auditioning for a horror movie during the Victorian era?

    1. Amodini at | | Reply

      Spot-on! Victorian horror it is. And the shoes with that outfit are mismatched and ghastly.

  7. Venus at | | Reply

    LOL, shes does look like a ghost from a victorian era movie ! ROFL! The outfit is too big for her i think. oh Sonam Sonam , when will be normal

  8. Saya at | | Reply

    Halloween came during Xmas. More than the gown I am flabbergasted by those wedges. Sonam, how can you stoop so low to wear those Vidya Balan type wedges? Tsk tsk.

  9. Madame Maddie at | | Reply

    Princessey? Puhlease! She looks like a nurse or caregiver from the Victorian era. And the wedges… eeks! When did Cinderella do kolhapuri??

    1. Maya at | | Reply

      +1. Could’t have phrased it better.

  10. Ragini at | | Reply

    reminds me of her cannes mcqueen appearance http://www.highheelconfidential.com/?s=sonam+alexander+mcqueen . But she looks pretty bad here.

  11. Fashion bubble at | | Reply

    This isn’t good from any angle . And I never thought I’d see Sonam in kohlapuri wedges.

  12. Vinnimeow at | | Reply

    Oh my my… That lower part of dress is so pretty, but then there is upper part too and Alas.! Beautiful white suddenly became tacky..

  13. Shreya at | | Reply

    ” she looks lovely” – seriously??? She looks like she is auditioning for the evil fairy role.

  14. praneeta at | | Reply

    Probably she could have tried wearing the separates… Together…. Even sonam can’t pull it off…. It looks like a bad outfit from the 90s….

  15. Kari at | | Reply

    Love the skirt..Its gorgeous! Blouse could have used better lining.

  16. rs at | | Reply

    Princesses are a very tween concept. So is Disneyland. She’s too old for this nonsense. Dress your age woman.

  17. Jiminywiminy at | | Reply

    Coo white tank under wam white dress. No. Just no.

  18. nav at | | Reply

    I’m sorry but what about this looks good? She looks like the Indian version of Florence Nightingale during war time. Except Nightingale was a nun. What’s Sonam’s excuse? The skirt looks too heavy to have a flow. In addition to the tank top, ya can’t miss the ‘coon eyes.

  19. Mariam at | | Reply

    This is def wt hey!! You guys would have ripped apart anyone else daring to wear something so bad!

  20. Ann at | | Reply

    Cinderella in Kolhapuris!!! Went overboard with the whole princess thing. And I have never seen a princess do a raccoon eye before! She needs to ditch the shoes and earrings, wear a more fitted (less fabric) top and better makeup to make such a look work.

  21. J_Street at | | Reply

    Bias much?

  22. pink martini at | | Reply

    BAD is the word..nothing , absolutely Nothing is working
    What Princessy..? She looks some sort of ghost out of a victorian era movie…

Leave a Reply