27 Responses

  1. ! at | | Reply

    blue one is much better.

  2. Nams at | | Reply

    The blue one on the left… colour is more vibrant and looks better structured.. the dress on the right looks so dull!

  3. Hema at | | Reply

    She looks much better in the blue dress , she looks photoshopped in the right picture.

  4. Nadia at | | Reply

    I want to ban photo shopping in magazines. The women look barely recognizable. I prefer the blue version.

  5. Jyoti at | | Reply

    how much photoshopping do they need to do?? they kill the human being and churn something else in the magazines.

    Pity these magazines, hope the readers know better

  6. Monkey at | | Reply

    Photoshop removes, oh wait, people USE photoshop to remove so much of body contour that she looks taller than usual and so strange…the proportion is gone.

  7. ar00j at | | Reply

    yea… whoever photoshopped her… hated her. I def like her better in her blue human form.

  8. debs at | | Reply

    she doesnt even look like herself is that hello picture….jesus…one wud think photoshop was for enhancing beauty!

  9. J at | | Reply

    OMG, this is the WORST case of photoshopping ever!!! She is looking completely disproportionate. It looks like the upper and lower parts of the picture are 2 different people. WHY!!!

  10. deepika at | | Reply

    could u post scans of this article . i live in america and cant buy the magazine here

  11. malini at | | Reply

    oh she looks horribly photoshopped in magazine. does not even look like her at all..
    INDIAN MAGS are going crazy with this photoshoppping.. .. LOSERS

  12. Prat at | | Reply

    Now just feel like snatching the Photoshop software from all the Magazine houses…..it is like nuclear bomb in the wrong hands.

    They just cannot appreciate the real beauty. And if they think the person is Photoshop worthy..why put them on the cover???

  13. xoxo at | | Reply

    she looks so much better in first one..ewww badly photoshopped

  14. fashionmaniac at | | Reply

    any time… the original is better than the fake one

  15. Sharin at | | Reply

    oh my god. They do nott know how to photoshop people. This is horrible how could they let this print!

  16. pdaervo at | | Reply

    it’s a sad testiment to whoever was the photographer and the editor of this mag that she looks better in real life than in their magazine

  17. diya at | | Reply

    dosnt really matter..i dont like the dress itself…its simple,..”eeekkk”

  18. Roni at | | Reply

    No matter what this lady wears she lacks facial expressions. She just has no features, which I think explains, her efforts to look stylish. Well her efforts are appreciated.

    1. suzy q at | | Reply

      it’s not that twinkle lacks facial expressions- it’s those hideously thinned eyebrows that make it seem so! back when she was an actress, she was cute and actually expressed things on screen…and also had some nicely shaped brows.

      watch her in “baadshah” and you’ll see what i mean.

  19. MM at | | Reply

    they photoshopped her BAD!!!

  20. sp at | | Reply

    umm … looks like some one just photoshop-ed her face on another body!!

  21. monika at | | Reply

    Like teh blue version much better

  22. rupal at | | Reply

    The angle at which she is posing in the champagne dress makes her look bigger!…The blue shows her body just right…looks lovely!

  23. Nidhi at | | Reply

    Hello Magazine needs to fire the photo-shop person!

  24. preeths at | | Reply

    that shade of blue is simply DIVINE!!!!
    y have they photoshopped her to look like a tall vase?

  25. Soniya at | | Reply

    This popular dress is on sale right now at Macys for $72.18 which is quite a steal. The original was $385.

  26. vee at | | Reply

    Her eyeliner is all wrong, which is bugging the hell out of me. Is it dreadful bottom-only eyeliner? Both dresses are equally good…why not change it up the second time, for example with sandals? Liked the hair both times.

Leave a Reply