7 Responses

  1. kasthuri at | | Reply

    This is precisely what i cant stand about “fashion”. Its like modern art.. can never understand it.

  2. dee at | | Reply

    Err…minus the name Kalol Dutta, would this be termed óriginal’? Doesnt work for me. The fabric looks crumpled and frumpy.

  3. c at | | Reply

    utter nonsense

  4. just me at | | Reply

    How do you reconcile “trite” with “original and fresh”? Or did you mean that the phrase “original and fresh” was trite? As for the collection itself, trite just about sums it up! I don’t know which is more painful to look at – the patches of cloth and swatches of fabric passing as “fashion” or the look on the models’ faces! Very “seen it all before and didn’t like it even then” collection.

  5. Honey at | | Reply

    What’s with the random pleats and folds here and there? I understand this is a Kallol Dutta signature, but I simply don’t get it. This is not flattering.

  6. bex at | | Reply

    Looks absolutely terrible. The clothes look crumpled, frumpy and ripped up. How do these “designers” make a living off of “designing” these?!

  7. jamila at | | Reply

    I get the story behind the line. nice one. The first row is too literal but stark. cohesive collection.

Leave a Reply