10 Responses

  1. olala at | | Reply

    Errr, why do we forget that not every photograph is MEANT to showcase the outfit. The outfit is not the focus here, because they probably did not WANT it to be the focus. And rightly so.

    So, a different gown or pose is irrelevant here.

  2. sonia at | | Reply

    this ad looks so stupid….if they really had to cut out her legs they could have just shown her face close up!
    and cos of the background red,i almost thought for a minute that those shoes are wedges!

    1. Liaa at | | Reply

      They aren’t ??

  3. GRUMPY CAT at | | Reply


  4. neha at | | Reply

    why oh why does she always wear these bulky sandals ……they make her legs look stalky…….lovely otherwise

  5. FashionVictim at | | Reply

    PnP, interesting that despite your extensive fashion knowledge, you didn’t notice the obvious “inspiration” from Givenchy Ruffle dress :)

  6. Srilalitha at | | Reply

    I wonder why you think a different dress or pose is needed – a black and white with Red accessories – the violin is also in red – looks good… and it is not the dress but the sound systems that are on display

  7. Ruby at | | Reply

    Yuck!!!! They look like Pamela Anderson shoes!!!!

  8. Éclat at | | Reply

    Ever wondered why the model looks so plastic and not human?! Haha most ridiculous use of a celebrity brand endorser ever.

  9. Kanchanmasi at | | Reply

    YSL Tributes! Her fave shoes

Leave a Reply