In Manish Malhotra

Comment image 16


Wearing a Manish Malhotra long anarkali, Diana attended a Diwali party on Wednesday evening. Looks like the outfit was so long, that even she had to wear platform sandals to make the pants work.

Having said that though, it’s an outfit that would’ve felt overwhelming on some but didn’t on her. She looked lovely.

Diana Penty


Photo Credit: Viral Bhayani

  • Like it? Share it!

16 Comments

  1. Some people have an understated elegance that makes even the gaudiest of outfits look better. Diana is one such person!

    Otherwise, the bottom part of that Anarkali is lost cause.

    58
    Reply
    • I’ll tell you what that elegance is. It is the delicateness that she gets by virtue of her height and her narrow frame. One could be tall and broader, which has its own appeal, but a slender frame makes you look fragile. It is also her posture, pose, and her facial expressions, all of which are measured but also exhibit a sense of ease – being confident but not in your face aggressive confident. And ofcourse her makeup, natural, not very flamboyant. Ive often noticed we find delicate ladies more elegant. I’m going to get all Marxian here, but I think that comes from such delicateness being a sign of not being someone who labours. Which subconsciously we equate with royalty/upper class/caste etc. Which is aspirational and hence attractive. It would be interesting to dwell on things we find attractive and not so atractive, it might reveal to us our own deeply held notions and beliefs. An interesting exercise.

      29
      5
      Reply
      • That’s an utterly persuasive argument and I’m tempted to agree whole-heartedly with you. But then I realise it would be remiss of me to ignore all those women around us who aren’t necessarily slender or conventionally pretty, and yet their inherent grace could be “aspirational”, to use your term. At a superficial level, our conditioning does prompt us to admire anyone who meets the predictable standards of beauty. But that applies mostly to people associated with glamour and fashion; it’s their physical attributes that meets our biased eye, and we aren’t digging deeper to see anything beyond that. (I’m sure they might be worth more than their physical beauty.) But when it comes to the world we live in, grace stops being exclusive to royalty, upper class, or caste. We may have our own real icons of elegance amidst us, at our workplace, among our friends and acquaintances. In my case, these include women not born into privilege, with hands as rough as they can get with daily chores, and with faces wrinkled with the hardships life has thrown at them. We have the prerogative of understanding beauty in our own ways and fortunately grace has nothing to do with the clothes or makeup you wear, or the face and figure you inherited. Just my two cents!

        10
        1
        Reply
        • A. I had to look up what this means 😛 and I’m a millennial albeit not very meme-aware
          B. Ha ha
          C. There is potential here for me to go on another rant about how the comments space should have a culture of free expression and that tangential thoughts offer an opportunity for creativity to happen etc. However, there is also a probability here that you are just being funny. In which case I resort to point B as a response to you.
          D. #geekyandiknowit #nerdzzrule

          2
          1
          Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *