31 Responses

  1. sp at | | Reply

    is there no one out there who can teach her anything about fashion??

  2. miray at | | Reply

    OMG! What is that??? The dress is maybe nice, but this panty?! An absolutely NoNo :S

  3. Annie at | | Reply

    Im still scratching my head over this new trend in India to wear dresses with mainly black panty hose.
    it only works on some i think!

  4. suchi at | | Reply

    it is a pity because amrita is so pretty. if she was uncomf with the hemline she should just wear a longer dress!

  5. Glitzy.Apple at | | Reply

    Really? I mean really!! Does her money grow on trees. How can she trade her hard earned money for such garbage?

    Its just sad…

  6. ariel001 at | | Reply

    the dress is nice & looks better on the model. & those are the ugliest pantyhose I’ve ever seen; its soo shiny and they make her legs look like barbie legs. lol

  7. SHY at | | Reply

    yeah that’s disgusting..

  8. Sonia99 at | | Reply

    Why? Why? Why?
    The fashion police needs to lock up this woman for life!!

  9. TINA at | | Reply

    pantyhose??! or tights!! uggghh…
    she is a lost cause… not sure why you guys even bother posting her anymore….

  10. Not A Sheep at | | Reply

    That is just plain wrong! The color looks beautiful on her and the dress could pass, had she not worn those darn pantyhouse and those ugly shoes.

    This girl is so beautiful, has such a great figure, could possibly wear anything in a normal way and she would look great.

    On a positive note, I can say that she does seem unpretentious and not too concerned about her own beauty/image. I kind of like that — it’s very unassuming.

  11. pdaervo at | | Reply

    might as well wear a sight that reads “IN DESPERATE NEED OF A STYLIST (OR GOOD FRIEND)”

  12. fashion-crazy at | | Reply

    YUCK!!!!! I’m gonna puke….

  13. Arshiya at | | Reply

    Shes soo pretty why the bad bad choices?

  14. Another Kiran in NYC at | | Reply

    OMG…. the panty hose police should put her in solitary confinement.

    Why is her chest sticking out like a shelf on wall brackets? Will someone tell this women than unless you have absolutely no breasts, a tight or shirred, cut straight across the top, looks really, really bad!

  15. archana at | | Reply

    maybe she hadnt shaved her legs!

  16. hk at | | Reply

    omg! does she own a mirror? disgusting!

  17. shoma at | | Reply

    Tch…tch, pretty dame got no aim…in fashion that is!

  18. saya at | | Reply

    The dress is fugly. It doesn’t work on the model even. Amrita, a prretty thing but only neck upwards.

  19. Priyanka D at | | Reply

    Why the pantyhose? Why??

  20. s_star at | | Reply

    i think she is conscious of her knees — if you all can just zoom in a bit and notice how dark they are — anyhow, methinks she needs a better stylist dahlings or someone to tell her that paparazzi’s have “flashbulbs”

  21. heh at | | Reply

    good girls don’t ‘expose’ their legs :P–such a disaster!

  22. Neha at | | Reply

    @archana: I was gonna say the same thing.

  23. anna at | | Reply

    i cant believe someone can do this.. esp her.. m sure she got ready with no electricity.. no one can manage to put on dt shiny panty hose n top it with open footwear…

  24. Filmi Girl at | | Reply

    Yuck! Those panty hose have to go!!! The dress is a *little* short but she could work it.

  25. honey at | | Reply

    HAHAHHA….She needs pearls to match the whole outfit..

  26. Enne at | | Reply

    That dress looks like it came from the cheap prom dress shops at the mall and those stage panty hose are hilarious!

  27. malini at | | Reply

    AIYEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.. AMrita never learns

  28. Roni at | | Reply

    Another case of ‘ALMOST’!

    Why cant Amrita just dress who she is and wear what’s comfortable in her skin.

    Life imprisonment for trashing a good attire.

  29. Indian Girl at | | Reply

    LOL !!! Does it get any worse …

  30. xoxo at | | Reply

    dress isnt that bad but amrita sure looks bad in it… hate the colour …and and ..is that stockinss..ewwww

  31. me at | | Reply

    oh my god ugly very ugly

Leave a Reply