67 Responses

  1. Priyanka D at | | Reply

    The cover pic isn’t as good as the second one. That one is really awesome. So, after Liz Hurley you can count Posh as another westerner who looks great in a saree.
    Who is the saree by, btw? P&P?

  2. Nick at | | Reply

    Is there even a little something about Posh that is Inidan?

  3. amisha at | | Reply

    priya tanna is running out of ideas. hate vb’s sulky pout.

  4. k=kirthi at | | Reply

    she sets the cover on fire! absolutely stunning!

  5. Rubs at | | Reply

    Is this a recent photoshoot, her hair looks circa 2003.

  6. Surbhi at | | Reply

    why is she looking angry???? the saree and cholii seem nice

  7. neha at | | Reply

    she looks angry… too much covered for comfort ?
    can vogue india pls get rid of this horrible brown background.. 2 issues in row.. urghhh…

  8. Zara at | | Reply

    I’m scared of her. Its like the Boogie Monster meets Princess Leah.

  9. Porus at | | Reply

    OMG! yet another wasted cover coming from Vogue India…I thought Halloween wasn’t until next month!

    1. Kriti at | | Reply

      Hahaha… Agreed. She looks angry and almost Ugly!!!

  10. vera at | | Reply

    even a faint smile would have gone a long way…

  11. neish at | | Reply

    hate it, sari’s nice but not on her wats with the cover look better off putting one of the hollywood actresses on it if they want a hollywood perspective cus she just lks eww in my opinion

  12. B at | | Reply


  13. dn at | | Reply

    Awful cover. She doesn’t look bad in the second photo. But they could have done such a better job in terms of clothes and styling.

  14. Swishy Set at | | Reply

    She looks like a doll

  15. hotnesss at | | Reply

    woww is this for real?? and how did her hair get so long lol

  16. Supriya at | | Reply

    Love it…

  17. Ritu at | | Reply

    Nice idea to have Posh on the cover, but the face shot is really bad! wonder why they used that one. She looks…drowned. And the chutti is misplaced.

  18. worship_elle at | | Reply

    ieuw?! photoshopped to the booooneeeeee

  19. Jazz at | | Reply

    somethings not quite right!!!

  20. deviousdiv at | | Reply

    She is Posh, and pretty in her petite way. But I’m sorry to say, that in this shoot, she looks washed out, dried up and like a fading clothes mannequin in a corner shop with a dusty mop for a ‘wig’.


    Or in your words… “WTHeyy!”

  21. me at | | Reply

    okay as if we don’t have enough stuck up people in Bollywood who just happy that they are gracing the world under their feet, now we have to deal with this one here who hardly smiles and thinks she owns the world

  22. malini at | | Reply

    nice.. for a change..

  23. Debs at | | Reply

    LOL…Vogue is really pulling out all stops!!!

    Posh looks pretty good in sari…but I wonder if she ever smiles!?!?!?

  24. La Vida Loca at | | Reply


  25. Nadia at | | Reply

    My feelings about this are indifferent. She looks pretty enough on the cover and the sari is beautiful but the overall effect is lackluster. It could the way she has draped the sari or her pose, I can’t put my finger on it.

    The sari only looks good on a full-bodied, curvy woman (a la Sridevi, Hema Malini, Katrina Kaif). I would be more interested in seeing someone like J Lo or Eva Mendes in a sari.

  26. Maya at | | Reply

    Wow!! I think she looks great! I love her with longer hair..so are those extensions or do you think this is an old photo?

  27. beni at | | Reply

    i like it!
    looks like a doll

  28. arbitary at | | Reply

    I might be biased, but i think only Indians look good in saris. The sari itself is gorgeous, but if Victoria was a few shades darker, she would look like a street urchin. I can’t stand the starved look!

  29. Vintage bunny at | | Reply

    I love it.She looks great in a saree

    PS:I love your blog,I left home 6 years ago and have no idea who half the actresses are so its a great way to keep up with trends.I have always said that India is far ahead when it comes to fashion trends.Skinny jeans came out 2 years before they were common in the US.

  30. Indian Girl at | | Reply

    Gorgeous !! I love Victoria and she looks great in the pics !

  31. the mad momma at | | Reply

    LOL@ arbitrary – very true. a saree, unlike western wear, looks better when filled out.

    undecided on what i think abt the cover. i do know i hate the hair colour.

  32. Hema at | | Reply

    She looks awesome in the pic to the right :) In the left one , she would have looked much better if she had smiled …

  33. Prem Rogue at | | Reply

    I’m sorry but non-Indian women more often than not look strange in saris and other Indian wear. Their body language is all wrong, particularly their way of standing. I don’t know what it is but desi women/girls, even those wearing a sari for the first time, just have a certain poise and natural grace in a sari.

    Only Maria Sharapova has managed to rock the sari. The exception proves the rule.

  34. shreya at | | Reply

    wow This Female manages to luk stunning in everything….

  35. lalmirchi at | | Reply

    waste of a cover i feel….Indian women way too superior!!

  36. arti at | | Reply

    biter n sweet-something nice and something not happening

  37. Enne at | | Reply

    the tikka on her head is so huge, she looks mad about it weighing down her dome. I’d like to see more pics from her shoot…

  38. mnnm at | | Reply

    i think it’s lehnga not saree…she wrapped the dupatta like saree. it looks as if she is not enjoying the outfit…very bored.

  39. Megha at | | Reply

    i like it
    kinda different!
    2nd pic especially

  40. Megha at | | Reply

    and great sari!! would love something like that when i’m a bride

  41. pinkster at | | Reply

    aaaawww Posh rocks!!!

    Anyone know where I can get a copy of Vogue India in the US?

    Also, are there anymore pics of this shoot?

  42. Aarthi at | | Reply

    I really believe that you need atleast some amount of curves to wear a saree. Posh looks like one of those pre-pubescent 11 yr old girls draped in a saree…(never mind the beach-wave hair….LOL)
    I think its a gorgeous saree…but I think her usual surly expression is a bit much for this cover!

  43. dahlia noir at | | Reply

    A smile wouldn’t have hurt.

  44. Osho at | | Reply

    She looks like soo young in the second picture, don’t you think. I am only thinking if she is wearing the vinyl boots beneath.

  45. pdaervo at | | Reply

    I was sure that she wasn’t ACTUALLY on the cover BUT LOOOOOK!!!!!!!!!
    I can only comment on mere mortals, and therefore can only bow down to Lady Posh (who can somehow manage heel-less – high-heeled boots) :D
    back to The Office!

  46. MM at | | Reply

    i wonder how much she eats a day – and how she survives with that amount.. she manages to look like she is 16!

    as far as the cover.. well interesting.. whatever.. covers are meant to get ur attention and this one gets one hard look

  47. hotnesss at | | Reply

    loool…even perez hilton is talking about it!!!

  48. mia at | | Reply

    they should have used better quality hair extensions / wig.

  49. Niks at | | Reply

    No offence, but she aint pretty!

  50. crab at | | Reply

    I’ve had enough of her simpering look.

  51. Aarthi at | | Reply

    OMG I remember those “heel-less high heels” she wore…saw the pic on fuggirls…
    now THAT is truly mind boggling!!

  52. BB at | | Reply

    She looks pretty. And she always has that face because she wants people to think about what she might be thinking about. That’s what I read in a recent interview from her.

  53. Ritu at | | Reply

    I think Westerners who have understood the concept of grace can still look good in a saree. Who can forget Liz Hurley in her pink crystal saree at the breast cancer event a couple of years ago? Sarees are more about grace than about fuller forms. After all aren’t most of our heroines looking pretty starved themselves nowadays…but still looking good in sarees?

  54. Rezia at | | Reply

    OMG!!! She looks more human here than she usually does. LOVE the long hair. It’s a really good look for her, rather than the usual assymetric, avant-garde, hard angular look she goes for.

  55. maya at | | Reply

    unlike always..she looks like a fellow being now…

  56. ena at | | Reply

    She looks like she’s very mad at someone and about to hit them… i’d be careful and stand a few feet away from her….

  57. pinknoise at | | Reply

    theyve gone really wrong on the drapes come on its freakin Vogue coudln they get someone to do the drapes right she looks like shes put the sari on in a hurry and got done with the shoot…sorry but the looks just not right

  58. pinknoise at | | Reply

    i love victoria the way she is with the sexy boots skinnys and a tank….and its vogue its international we arent payin to see someone dresses like the women on indias roads who look way more graceful that her

  59. eclat at | | Reply

    Posh supposedly doesn’t like her smile too much, so that’s why she never does when posing. Other than that, it’s a horrid, dull, flat photograph of her- the cover looks totally washed out.

  60. Apurva at | | Reply

    thats a really bad cover..i now get it..the aishwarya cover was also shot in london in the same hotel..hehehehe..they are quite chaluu…two covers in one go!

  61. Jeanie at | | Reply

    hmmm.. not sure how that picture made the cover.

    i think it’s great that she made it on the cover, but what about all the indian ladies out there!!!

  62. Protyasha at | | Reply

    I like it….This makes me actually want to run to the stands….finally another after the april cover!

  63. Jadore Fashionista at | | Reply

    I think she looks stunning ! Tho i wouldnt hurt her to smile a bit. And I have to agree..FINALLY an intresting looking issue XXX

  64. Sanam at | | Reply

    she atleast could have put an smile on her face
    it looks like she doesnt even wanne be there

  65. Amrita at | | Reply

    Well Well ………..so much written bout her already………just wana say………had she worn the saree instead of just drapping it around her body would have made all the difference .

  66. Moh at | | Reply

    not at all an appealing cover. Don’t know who to blame…the model or the photographer.
    she looks pissed off in the picture…

Leave a Reply