Deepika For L’Officiel: (Un)Covered
March 6th, 2013 at 12:16 am . by PriyankaL’Officiel put Deepika on its March cover dressed in Dior. Styled in the same metallic blue eye-shadow as shown on the runway, Deepika cuts quite the striking picture. The cover itself, not as much. The typeface is bit of a downer!
|
Left: Christian Dior, Spring 2013
Right: Deepika Padukone For L’Officiel, March 2013
Photo Credit: L’Officiel, Style
Muy Caliente!!
agree. face says 2013, font says 1993!
haha..+1
wow!!!! gawwwjjus gal
Is it just me or does her leg look like it is someone else’s. I think waist down it has a weird anorexic look and I think Deepika is much more full bodied than that!
I too feel the legs are weird. Like they cut it from the model and pasted on her.
Bad photoshop.
+1. It does look anorexic and unlike Deepika. But also i dont like the pose, the hair and the hairline is a bit unatural. I like the idea of this (esp the eye shadow) look but i dont think it translated well.
And all this besides a very uncreative cover which is straight off the runway! This is plaigarising in the fashion world if you ask me. No imagination to step it up for the cover whatsover. Oh yes, they did not include the bag;)
The only thing L’Officiel did right was picking Deepika, also love the eye makeup.
Can’t believe this is a magazine cover that will be put up on stands across the country where she is showing half breasts. It is a pity with what is happening to expose people to such pictures.
Well I guess selling is what matters.
I have to agree with you..
To a common man, this is a woman wearing a jacket and nothing else, baring her legs and cleavage (or lack of it)
Same goes for PC’s cover, where she’s in a bikini.
If we are going to point fingers at bollywood, item songs, and even rap artists, fashion magazines too should have their own share of it.
LOL!! where did her crotch go- do her legs begin from the waist?? such bad photoshopping!
love the white and aqua combo though!
Those legs….totally weird!!! Dont like the cover.
bad pose(not photoshop) because it’s making her legs look scarily scrawny.
Bad photoshop job on the legs!
i don’t like the cover she is just looking so naked
+1
The legs are weird and belong on a stick figure. That face, though…gorgeous!!
Why have they photoshopped Anushka Sharma’s legs on to her???
Nah! too much skin show and as others pointed out, the bad photoshop job on the legs isn’t helping either!
THey have photoshopped her face to Aishwarya!
^ same thoughts here
wow ok phtoshopped legs… but face is gorgeous as always
she luks HOT ….could be a Bond Gal hands down !!!
totally agree, have been harping on Dee being the next Bond gal too!
Wow – wot innovative creative styling……not!
Just copy right off the ramp….sheesh
Legs look weird like most have mentioned. But she does have the body to carry off that jacket look. Its funny to always read the breast policing comments that too on a magazines cover. Lol
naturally sexy gal- looking good DEE!
loooove the way Dior looks with Raf Simons heading…the classic element was soo missed- this Dior coat is another example.
btw, would love to see more Jean Paul Gaultier on some of these girls here… and Yohji Yamamoto, Rajesh Pratap Singh, Lilia Pustovit.
gorgeous Deepika makes it work, another fab look! – love it.
She looks like a plastic barbie doll, the digital processing is too much!
another boring cover yaaaaaaaawnnnnnn