13 COMMENTS

  1. I prefer Anchal’s. It’s much more classic and with just the right amount of hardware for my liking.

    Guys check mail!




    0



    0
  2. DEfinitely prefer the metallic one…the black looks almost fake, chloe leathers are supple and incredibly soft but the black leather looks too hard and rigid. also missing the trademark studs at the bottom of the bag




    0



    0
  3. none.. chloe paddington are like almost a yr n half old..

    n when i visited hongkong last year.. they were selling them by the heaps (fake ofcourse).. n even oxford street’s been selling them since last year..

    n shit how can i forget, i have a white one which is almost a yr old n have hardly used it..




    0



    0
  4. I just don’t understand the thinking. Buy an expensive name brand bag, but look like crap. Unfourtunatly in India, the bag wears the woman not the other way around. People should come to NYC and see what style is, they might just save some money. I have seen women who wear H&M bags and look more stylish.




    0



    0
  5. Both the bags are ordinary . I’ve seen a lot of high end premier designer bags which look pretty run of the mill . whts the deal with that .




    0



    0
  6. The black does look fake doesn’t it. For the fashionistas out there – would someone do something as crazy as I did – I got the bigger Chloe Paddington – special ordered it (I wanted greyish blue) from net-a-porter in Feb 06 to use as my diaper bag, had to pay customs on it. It was the only thing I bought before my son came in Aug 06. I think it was worth the money as I have used it almost everyday for almost 2 years.
    Also, agree now you can get it everywhere on sale.




    0



    0
  7. but guys if it was fake, wouldnt P&P noticed it much sooner than all of us?
    lol wow @Ritu…specially ordered? hehehe ur bub’s gonna have an awesome time when he grows up, such a stylish mum!




    0



    0

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here