23 Responses

  1. BLT at | | Reply

    I don’t like either – both accentuate anunflattering waist and broadish torso.

  2. Aarthi at | | Reply

    I think she looks much better in the second pic!

  3. AstralDust at | | Reply

    In my mind, few things can be worse that that pleated polyester monstrosity she appeared in the last time around!

    As for the current look, I could nitpick about the different shades of black (if they are both black) and also that the shoes don’t quite work, but I’ll give this outfit a Pass grade.

  4. lolita at | | Reply

    Love it! She looks fab!

  5. malini at | | Reply


  6. Surbhi at | | Reply

    what a confused ensemble.. she decided to wear the waistcoat, then ditched the jeans and wore the whatever.. or better still cut her trousers and then wore heels which prolly look better with a skirt or something of that sort.. oh and just that we dont think she is all black, they had to be red.. confused.com

  7. anita at | | Reply

    at first i thought she wasnt wearing any shoes- then i found ’em…

  8. michelle at | | Reply

    hey singh is kking ka asar dikhta hai!

  9. melange at | | Reply

    Fab. Looking good.

  10. priya at | | Reply

    she’s looking better than she did in th 1st pic… could have looked much better if she had worn full length pants.

  11. Bombay Girl at | | Reply

    Ho hmmm When the page opened, the right pic showed her only waist up and i thought, “Wow looks like a nice ensemble” and then it ended at the knees. The outfit looks incomplete and shows the cellulite on her legs. Notice the dimpled areas? Like her shoes in both pics though.

  12. Another Kiran in NYC at | | Reply

    EEEEESH…. she should just go home. Both looks are JUST AWFUL. Nuff said.

  13. tina at | | Reply

    A younger person could pull off those shorts, maybe. Nobody could pull off that dress.

  14. pdaervo at | | Reply

    formal shorts may be a trend…but I don’ think those kind are amazing in anyway
    she looks better, but not particularly good

  15. Isha at | | Reply

    If the wiki on Sangeeta Bijlani is true (such an oxymoron – ‘wiki’ and ‘truth’ ;-) ) then she is 48 now and for her age – SHE ROCKS!!!

  16. archana at | | Reply

    shorts and a waistcoat are never a good look for anyone. even kate moss pairs her waistcoat with jeans. pleats are also usually unflattering on most people.

  17. K at | | Reply

    @ Isha: 48?!? No way!!! Sangeeta only started out in BW in the late 80s. One of her first movies I saw was Jurm (released in ’90) and she looked pretty fresh and young’n in there…. might’ve been in her early 20s there. So now, she’s about 40. She was also Salman Khan’s ex.

  18. Isha at | | Reply

    48?!? No way!!!

    Bijlani was crowned Miss India in 1980. She definitely is not 40 now. For her to be 40 now, she must have been 12 the time she won the Miss. India title :)

  19. ana at | | Reply

    Whats wit the hair? its high time she spent on a stylish hair cut…

  20. Adit at | | Reply

    47 darling…one year younger than Lubna Adams

  21. archana at | | Reply

    bijli looks great for 47. she should update her hair though.

  22. Adit at | | Reply

    Some women are like Princess Diana, they like one look, and nothing wrong with that. She looked great at the Azeem show, this is a very unflattering pic, because you cannot see her translucent skin..

  23. rubywoo at | | Reply

    the hair needs updating – barbie hair looks horrid on all the 20-something starlets and on one as mature as bijliani it just doesn’t go, good figure though and I like the shoes in the second pic, tailored knee length shorts are difficult to pull off by most so not even going to comment on them.

Leave a Reply