32 Responses

  1. KayAar at | | Reply

    Oh !! I only see Ranveer ? Where is Vaani ??? :P

  2. MissNoName at | | Reply

    i think it’s very unfair that they put Vaani in a lingerie and Ranveer in a suit; actually, doesn’t gel together on the cover. ranveer should have been in negligee as well :P

    1. Yashi at | | Reply

      My thoughts too

  3. Sapphire at | | Reply

    Ew! Looks cheap.

    1. Fashionvibe at | | Reply

      +10000! It is is possible for a woman to look both classy and sexy in this type of outfit. Sadly she doesn’t look either. They should have got someone else.

  4. Moni Pal at | | Reply

    Plain cheap! Vulgur actually! Kind of soft porn!

    1. Sapphire at | | Reply

      Oh thank God! I am not the only one who thought like that. There are classy people and there are hot people but these both look crass and sleazy.

    2. Kasthuri at | | Reply


    3. Parul at | | Reply


  5. Tanvi at | | Reply

    What the ….????

  6. slc at | | Reply

    I do like the second pic (on the stairs). The cover…a little too risqué for my taste, especially because it is a cover. That said Ranveer looks yummy.

  7. Pari at | | Reply

    Vulgur and dirty . My eyes can’t see this

  8. DP at | | Reply

    Nice makeup and at least its not another bride in a lehenga.

    The photo is terrible though. Where does Ranveer’s left hand end? And is she sat on his shoulders? Just looks v awkward.

  9. Kannu at | | Reply

    It looks good.. interesting. But ranveer takes the show ..
    Also P&P plz feature Karena and Karishma’s photo shoot. They look smoking ..

  10. Avani at | | Reply

    This looks ultra cheap and trashy. And also that chiseled face, feature is of someone else so where is Vaani? Lol.

  11. H at | | Reply

    I’m disappointed in the posture / posing. Does the magazine really need to stoop this low and entice readers with vulgarity / erotica? Vaani is better than that. Another display of women as a seductive object. Yeckh.

    1. Fashionvibe at | | Reply

      Can’t believe this is Harpers Bazaar magazine. If this was maxim or Gq then such a cover makes sense. Vaani looks tacky not sexy.

  12. Paroma at | | Reply


  13. Panache at | | Reply

    Vaani looks tacky. She is sitting on his shoulder wearing that lingerie. How vulgur

    1. Moni Pal at | | Reply


  14. Lily at | | Reply

    Such prudes!

  15. Deepti at | | Reply

    Really thought it was sonam on the cover for a second!

  16. Ash at | | Reply

    What’s all the fuss about. I think they look hot

  17. neena at | | Reply

    A veil with indian style jewellery with a bathrobe kinda thing falling off.Her hand looks scarily pasted on his shoulder…..The only thing that would have saved it would have been some chemistry…..if it existed.Very ummmmm…..don’t know..don’t want to know

  18. Shereen at | | Reply

    The cover is sleazy.

  19. Fergie at | | Reply

    Plain weird.

  20. Ranjani at | | Reply

    Why didn’t they make Vaani look at the camera on the cover photo? They wanted her to be the coy bride with the “hot body” in a “bold” pose??
    Tasteless cover !!

  21. Hansini at | | Reply

    Ranveer looks amazing of course. But any particular reason Vaani is letting all hang out while Ranveer is covered up? Is that what brides are supposed to do?

  22. Icecastle at | | Reply

    What is prudish about calling this cover vulgar? It does look cheap. If you like it go ahead and like it, nobody is stopping, but others can find it cheap.

  23. kamar jahan at | | Reply

    lol this is plain yucky

    bridal cover!

  24. Imli at | | Reply

    Finding the cover vulgar too especially how Vaani has her legs open.
    A big NO from me.
    (Ranveer looks great throughout the shoot though)

  25. Sup at | | Reply

    I like everything except the pose.. even one leg over his shoulder would’ve looked better..
    this reminds me of manspreading… or rather woman-spreading.. both uncool.

Leave a Reply