33 Responses

  1. Sup at | | Reply

    Man ! this gives the old Rani vibe from a few years back.
    M sure its a lot photo-shopped (especially her very bony angular jaw which we haven’t seen in years), but is such a throwback to her more familiar self.

    1. suhani at | | Reply

      Angular jaw … there you said it. !!!!!

      just recently At Vogue beauty Award , we saw ROUND RANI ;-)

  2. SQ at | | Reply

    This is a WOW cover. That being said, how much of this WOW is real and how much of this is photoshopped? I am all for glamourous stars, but not when it isnt real. I love the dress – Dolce & Gabbana have really hit it out of the park with their latest collection.

  3. Sirisha at | | Reply

    That doesn’t look like Rani Mukherjee at all!

  4. baddys at | | Reply

    I have been so disappointed with Rani’s appearances lately. But this is great, really great. She seems so herself and confident. Love it!

  5. KayAar at | | Reply

    Oh my dear Rani. I thought it was Daisy Shah :((((

    1. Eena at | | Reply

      Ditto

    2. mary at | | Reply

      I thought it was Parineeti Chopra

    3. sanaa7262 at | | Reply

      I thought it was Daisy Shah too!!

  6. caligirl at | | Reply

    Omg this is photoshopped to such an extent that it’s hard to recognize her!!!!

  7. SJ at | | Reply

    Where is the rest of her face?
    Aside from that she looks lovely!

  8. Nancy at | | Reply

    I had a hard time recognizing her. So much photo-shop. I am not even looking any further at that pic….. feel very sorry that Vogue is not promoting the natural face/body.

  9. slc at | | Reply

    This woman is beautiful…photo shopped and all! I’m just glad they didn’t lighten her skin tone.

  10. shwetha at | | Reply

    Photo shopped so much, and so badly that it looks like some one else, and quite an unnatural one at that
    What is wrong with these mags with their obsession with photoshopping and even sillier is tha fact that the actress/ models dont put their foot down on such atrocity

    P&P, please take stand and dont post such artificial computer generated stuff on your blog

  11. Dits at | | Reply

    Sorry who is this ? It is so photoshopped, you think it looks like her , but cant be sure

  12. rs at | | Reply

    I don’t know who this is

  13. Jiminywiminy at | | Reply

    Well hubba hubba! Rani is looking super hot!

  14. LCoodly at | | Reply

    Now we can see what wonders the right makeup, hair, lights, photography and Photoshop can do! Rani looks fabulous.

  15. Stolen at | | Reply

    All of you referring to her jawline,please check out pics from the Vogue Beauty Awards. She’s always had an awesome jawline. Stop being so picky! Every cover is shopped. At least she doesn’t look like a ghost.

  16. AK at | | Reply

    OH PLEASE !!!! THIS DOES NOT EVEN LOOK LIKE HER

  17. sonam at | | Reply

    So much editing..It looks like a painting of Rani!

  18. Violet at | | Reply

    It’s covers and shoots like these that set impossible standards for women.
    In her recent appearances you can clearly see that her face is round. Cheekbones and jawbones have appeared out of nowhere. It’s sadly very apparent that excessive Photoshop (I’m sorry i refuse to believe it’s just make-up) has been used to portray what Vogue thinks is the meaning of ‘Ageless’. Why can’t we celebrate he for who/what she really is?
    Second, why the hell is a 37 year old woman on an issue about age? Men decades older than her are romancing girls half their age and Rani has been chosen as the face of an Ageless issue? And Vogue has the gall to talk about Women Empowerment? I’m ashamed and quite frankly embarrassed for you Vogue…

    1. Teja at | | Reply

      I so agree..

    2. fromchi-town at | | Reply

      Hear, hear!! I totally agree – I cannot, for the life of me understand how can a 30 something old woman can be the face of an ageless issue? Bollywood actresses talk of ageism and still agree to be a part of such campaigns. Smh. As for Vogue, the less said, the better.

  19. Rani at | | Reply

    Super photoshopped !!!!!!!!!!
    Sad …. Y wud anyone hide their own natural looks

  20. Avani at | | Reply

    This is Rani? hm errrr from which angle? lol. It is sad sh*t that these women allow themselves to be photoshopped to a level that no one can recognize them.
    PS: This can’t be seen outside of glossy pages because Photoshop can’t be done in real life. Your wish will remain unfulfilled P&P. :P

  21. Asha at | | Reply

    P&P – if Photoshop existed outside of magazine covers, then I’m sure you would see not just “some of this Rani” but a lot more of her outside the glossy pages :-)

    1. Avani at | | Reply

      We have the same comment albeit worded differently. ;) But that “lot more of her”takes the cake. LOL.

  22. Sampada at | | Reply

    Is it just me or she really looks like that girl from Jai Ho?

  23. Shi at | | Reply

    VOGUE’s worst cover!

  24. Fashion bubble at | | Reply

    Photoshopped or not am I the only one who thinks she looks quite bad here .

  25. Sm at | | Reply

    That’s not Rani!!! Don’t the stars think it surreal when they see themselves on magazine covers….it says it’s them….but it doesn’t look like them. Photoshop is not cool.

  26. Amit at | | Reply

    Boring.

Leave a Reply