19 Responses

  1. Yasmine at | | Reply

    their both yummmy, but akshay’s by farrrr is better. ranbir’s cover setting is way too busy. get a headache from looking at it and the expressions of the ladies is downright scary and akshay is majestic. YUMMMMMM!

  2. pdaervo at | | Reply

    Ranbir’s scares me
    I prefer Akshay’s, but are those cut-out women :/ They sure look like it

    1. rêve at | | Reply

      hey! that wht i thought!!
      quite spooky how 2D all 3 women look!
      the one on the left of Akki is kinda floating!

    2. Chocolate Martini at | | Reply

      @pdaervo: I have the actual magazine, and they definitely do not look like cutout women!!! I think its just that this picture isnt of a very high quality.

      Also, I am sure L’officel would never od something that unprofessional ;-)

      1. pdaervo at | | Reply

        Haha, I knew they weren’t cut out women (or I was hoping)
        I just meant that the might have been horribly photoshopped
        but I’m glad they weren’t

  3. vp at | | Reply

    BOTH! Ranbir is new, hot & sexy, of course many girls want him!
    Akshay looks smart, handsome, something older women prefer (plus he is married). It fits their profile.

    I think they photoshopped their faces too much.. Akshay looks way too young in the cover..probably early 20s (i’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but it shows how much he has been photoshopped), this pic shows an oval face and in real his face isn’t that way..
    Same goes for Ranbir, too much photoshop

    But both of them look very sexy!

  4. SS at | | Reply

    Wow – Akshay’s cover is really quite terrible; it makes me very uneasy somehow.

  5. Swati at | | Reply

    one thing i want to know – if you are showing a bunch of women lusting after the actor or vice versa, shouldn’t they all be looking AT the actor concerned rather than staring zombie like at different parts of the frame …… this is something i always wonder everytime i see such a cover … they seem to get it wrong everytime or do i have the wrong idea.

    waise, as much as i don’t like ranbir, his cover seems far better

    1. GG at | | Reply

      Agree to your comment on the way the women are posing .This applied especially to Ranbir’s cover. Which by the way is heavily photoshopped.He does not have such a angular face.

  6. Tina at | | Reply

    I am surprised how photoshopped every cover is these days!! Its really a put-off! Besides that, both the men are yummy!
    Look at the girl holding ranbir on the left- could she be more ripped!??! its a little scary!

  7. Kiwi at | | Reply

    Ranbir…. all the way, Akshay can never look as appealing… lacks classiness(?? ) which his wife has (oodles of it)

  8. Garima at | | Reply

    Ranbir..*le sigh*
    The things I’d do to him….

  9. Chocolate Martini at | | Reply

    PnP I know its not your fault that you couldnt find better pictures but the poor quality of these pics completely takes away from the beauty of both covers. I subscribe to the magazinee and both issues look infinitely better in real life

  10. aishwarya at | | Reply

    ranbir luks awesuuuuuuuuuuuum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    m surely buyin d ranbir cover!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  11. KS at | | Reply

    Yawn….not at men/women but at the concept…such a cliche!

    1. Chocolate Martini at | | Reply

      I agree!!! I was thinking the same thing. Also PnP do you think you could you post the entire spread?

      Ranbir’s shoot has a massive faux paux where he’s wearing a jacket unbutonned to reveal PLENTY of chest hair (gag) and Akshay’s shoot has a positively crass (in my opinion) picture where he’s surrounded by multiple pairs of legs clad in panty hose alone. It looks more like something out of a B’wood item number (albeit a B’wood item number with a fab stylist)than a french couture magazine’s spread.

      1. KS at | | Reply

        LOL @ chest hair. It should have ended with one kapoor (read Anil) ;).

  12. Nick at | | Reply

    Ranbir looks more relaxed than Akshay.. even though it is tough to relax with a camera in ur face.

  13. rushil at | | Reply

    ranbir! ranbir! ranbir! coz i m so biased……

Leave a Reply