50 Responses

  1. M at | | Reply

    gosh…what a way to draw attention to you know what……………….

  2. pava at | | Reply

    agree .. truly wtheyyyy!!! her back side reminds me of those dancers with feathers on their butt. I find the shoes ugly too.

  3. preeths at | | Reply

    give her a break guys
    maybe she had to do an item number at the bash with rakhi sawant??!!?? :P

  4. nina at | | Reply

    d drapes luk lyk d indian lungi……

  5. suchi at | | Reply

    wow really ugly

  6. jiji at | | Reply

    Lol, all i can say is ‘ Mugdha darling..??” What the hheeeyyy???!!!’ lol

  7. apsara77 at | | Reply

    ohmigod, my eyes, my eyes! there is definately too much happening with the draping of this dress and it is too raunchy for my taste…i guess even a fashionista like Mugdha has her off-days…i do like the color though…that’s about it.

  8. Monkey at | | Reply

    I have a question: Did she stand the whole time at the function? I don’t think its possible to sit, at all, in that dress.

  9. Madhu at | | Reply

    Killer body, but oh what a display of it – needless, to say the least. This one’s bordering on trashy for me – she marginally escapes just because it’s Mughda.

  10. debs at | | Reply

    eemmmm…it’s a bit…you know, not very appropriate. :/

  11. preeths at | | Reply

    she IS dressed like the dancers you see in bollywood songs…
    its the truth guys
    is there some new comment policy im not aware of ???

  12. Shruti at | | Reply

    She is looking… quite… nude.

  13. priyanshu at | | Reply

    uuu…don’t like it on her..

  14. deewani at | | Reply

    ok so she might have thought that the back of the dress was sexy, but did she not see the front? how ill fitting is that dress from the front, truly trashy choice

  15. preeths at | | Reply

    sorry ladies :)

  16. AnotherKiranInNYC at | | Reply

    Diaper in back, and badly constructed 50’s corset in the front.

    Draping my arse! Yeah, literally. Who designed this monstrosity? And was Mughdha blind?

    1. arati at | | Reply


  17. _*Dia*_ at | | Reply

    fugly. just plain fugly.

  18. Sassy_girl at | | Reply

    OMG why this pretty lady is wearing a fashion disaster .. front is atleast bearable back is horrible..

  19. Pamela at | | Reply

    The dress is nice…it’s her 80s make-up (think prom) thats off putting.

  20. VirgoVixen at | | Reply

    WHAT??!! *super shocked*
    So did not expect this from Mugdha, always liked her style. Dissapointing!:(

  21. beans at | | Reply

    @monkey…lol! that’s exactly what i was also thinking…

  22. pri at | | Reply

    ooh a shiny satin diaper.

  23. Payal at | | Reply

    yukkkkkk! she might as well could have worn a swin suit

  24. KK at | | Reply

    I think this dress could’ve looked better in a different color and less shiny fabric. But the blue dress and crazy shoes is TOTALLY WTHeyy!!

  25. pan at | | Reply

    looks like a kashta!!!! hehehehe

  26. monika at | | Reply

    lol pri.

  27. kk at | | Reply

    hey wts wrong wth u guys… u dnt LIKE tht, thts bizzarre, i guess highheel has some problem wth GAVINs cloths, they always trashed it, nd only trashy comments hv been shown here, i wont be surprised if this comment is not displayed, just tells me t truth.. voohoo enjoy i love t look its too sexy for anyone to understd, n yess if tre wud hv been an international brand or celeb sportg it, it wud hv got full marks, knowing The Wanna bs…

  28. Jazz at | | Reply

    omg that looks sleazy

  29. alive'n'kicking at | | Reply

    vegas girl…oops, she left d feathers bak hme!!

  30. Tongue in Chic at | | Reply


  31. ShoeAddict at | | Reply


  32. Shruti at | | Reply

    Awe yeah that’s…not nice :S

  33. SM at | | Reply

    I can use this as my swim dress!

  34. Nidhi at | | Reply

    no! mudgha, please no..

  35. kk at | | Reply

    Wow I love it

  36. Someone had to tell you at | | Reply

    It’s like those drapes are grabbing her ass. And are working their way up the back. Gah, 50s science fiction.

  37. Saya at | | Reply

    Thanks Mughda for the hearty laughter you gave us all. =D

    @monkey: one can wear some nude shorts under their minis. sitting cross-legged would help too. =P

  38. Nehaj at | | Reply

    But she carried it off well…very few people can carry off a dress like that..

  39. A at | | Reply

    OMG! thats plain awful..

  40. the mad momma at | | Reply

    ouch. why would one do this to themselves? the mind boggles..

  41. Sam at | | Reply

    OMG you people are out of your mind,
    I love it!

  42. belle déesse at | | Reply

    the dress does look a lttle trashy, but whats even more trashy (I doubt this is going to get approved) is the cheap way people have commented on this dress. A little bit of class never hurt anyone chicas!!! (and by this I mean the commentors, not just mughda)

  43. Dee at | | Reply

    everything’s sad..the dress, the makeup, the hair, the shoes….!! looks cheap to say the least. it’s a BIG ‘wtheyyy!!’

  44. B-listed at | | Reply

    I like the dress! Looks a little like armour!The shoes and make-up is a no no though!

  45. suzy q at | | Reply

    And, the INELEGANT mugdha godse strikes again!

  46. Rids at | | Reply

    i agree with KK ..its a nice dress….i love it

  47. meria at | | Reply

    OMG! such an ugly dress.how did she manage 2 wear it.

  48. preeti at | | Reply

    owwwwwwww…such a bad dress!!!

Leave a Reply