In Anita Dongre Timeless

Comment image 35


While, I loved the solid pieces from the recent Anita Dongre Timeless collection, wasn’t a big fan of this print. On the runway, the Amrapali jewellery helped the look but without it, it’s barely striking. You like?

Left: Anita Dongre, Winter/Festive 2010
Right: Mallika Sherawat at Dandia

Photo Credit: Viral Bhayani

  • Like it? Share it!

35 Comments

  1. Making the obvious joke – is that mallika ? i couldn’t recognize her with all those clothes 🙂

    …. mallika not bearing any of her assets and dressed demurely by any ones standards …. nice change … i like

    Reply
  2. I love it!!

    its simple and elegant, dull but she makes it look good..

    i have probably never ever said anything nice about mallika..first time for everything i guess.

    p.s how amazing do those peep-toes look with the outfit?!

    Reply
  3. the dress is so ordinary… agree that she looks good but how can you call that dress designer? nothing special about the dress, print or pattern.

    Reply
  4. oh C’mon P&P… For once you gotta appreciate Mallika for changing it up. Dress is striking or not, overall she looks good. Atleast the appreciation would encourage her to cover it up more often 🙂

    Reply
  5. looks great..simple is way to go for a change… i like!!in this case i wud ignore the print or accessory..its mallika…such an improvement!!

    Reply
  6. Again the disturbing, taliban-esque penchant for women to be ‘covered up’. Oh dear….how oppressive.

    She does look beautiful though, and its a lovely simple outfit, very light and pretty. I just don’t see the need to cheer a woman for ‘covering up’. Thats as backward as it gets. What next, throw a party for her if she dons a veil?

    Reply
    • get over it love! now you are bordering on overkill…!
      theres nothing “taliban-esque” about bloggers “cheering” over this so called “covered up” look … you only need to see what mallika wore in the past to understand the nature of comments here … and the obvious joy in her new look!

      Reply
        • Exactly!!!! why use such a strong term…covered up does not mean oppressive at all! but having to see someone dress in a certain way again n again n again…its a nice and beautiful change….women can be classy even when they are showing off their ‘assets’. So nobody is against or for her donning a particular attire!!

          Reply
    • You do realize it’s annoying to see someone’s boob again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again again and again. It was like Vidya balan in an anarkali all over again.

      Change is good.. The fact that she looks as hot as she does in a mini is a testament to her hotness..

      Reply
  7. She looks amazingly beautiful.Very simple and decent.I am in love with her dress and makeup.I dont think print is ugly.
    Indian dresses are supposed to be like that.

    Reply
  8. wow Wow WOW!!!
    she looks great… she’s taking this simple… lackluster anarkali and raising it to a new level of elegance…i never thought she was pretty … but man … she’s got something going for her!
    anyway… i hape a soft spot for gujari prints … so i like the outfit 🙂

    Reply
  9. oh my god.
    is that really mallika?
    *eyes widen and jaw drops*

    she looks good!

    p.s. guys, please use this comment not the one before…made a slight spelling error before 😛

    Reply
  10. She is a good looking lady with a body to match.and here she is. Working working it totally And no the anarkali does not lack anything. The print isn’t that bad.

    Reply
  11. It’s simple enough, it has no pretension and it works I think. I can imagine it would’ve looked a bit dull on some else but Malika carries this outfit off pretty well!! She looks GOOD 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *