20 Responses

  1. Wannabe at | | Reply

    Mallaika, I guess…if i must choose. But I HATE her footwear…is her big toe spilling outta that ridiculous contraption?

  2. k= at | | Reply

    the longer version is so much more elegant! love the necklace natasha is wearing too! and her bag.

    malaika first of all ruined the stunning dress by cutting in short in those WEIRD frills. plus those shoes cant get any tackier!! STARS?? hate her clutch too! it doesnt even match the dress!

  3. ami at | | Reply

    malaika’s dress is a good fit on top, but there’s something about her knee area that seems to break the flow. as for natasha, she always manages to choose the most unflattering styles for her body type…

  4. Nisha at | | Reply

    Malaika’s…but I wish the dress did not have that silly ruffle at the hem.

  5. Nisha at | | Reply

    BTW, the year stated in the caption says “2005”. I’m guessing that’s a typo.

  6. Shweta at | | Reply

    Obviously Malaika…but dont really like the dress:/

  7. rubyoo at | | Reply

    neither to be honest – both look meh – Malaika edges the meh stakes in this instance just by that awful toe squeezing sandals… eewh.

  8. anita at | | Reply

    Malaika’s shoes ruined it for me

  9. Nosh at | | Reply

    They both look terrible. I vote for fardeen!

  10. pdaervo at | | Reply

    the long is much much classier

  11. hana at | | Reply

    Neither… I don’t like the dress too, and too tired of looking short dresses on malaika, what is it? complexed?

  12. NMV at | | Reply

    Natasha gets my vote.. just not sure why she wore it to an Indian wedding?

  13. mia at | | Reply

    i like arbaaz out of these four even though it’s tacky to leave shirt unbuttoned.

  14. spur at | | Reply

    how cool is that.. lol 2005 dress discussed in 2008!
    u ladies could have easily waited another month to drop this pic in 2009! typically fashion forward, aren’t we?

  15. fashionmaniac at | | Reply

    Malaika gets the vote but her shoes are an eye sore.
    Natasha has a very broad body build and she needs to complement it with sleek clothes.

  16. ambreen at | | Reply

    i thnk malaika is too revealing and pathetically ugly..
    natasha is much pretty thn malaika.. bt malaikas boday says it all.. but i wud still go for natasha..
    the body doesnt make a person hot.. its the face :)

  17. xoxo at | | Reply

    dont like it much bt if choosin one il go with malaika bt her shoes n tat earpiece ruins it all

  18. Srishti at | | Reply

    Malaika of course!!Natasha needsto know she is just not mase to carry such dresses.

  19. zina at | | Reply

    malaika, any day!

Leave a Reply