53 Responses

  1. dn at | | Reply

    Hideous. The common thread is that they all sponsored this cover :)

  2. T at | | Reply

    The common aspect is that they are “wives of rich/celebrity husbands”

  3. Lavanya at | | Reply

    One common aspect- Socialites!!!

  4. Sweta at | | Reply

    Too much photo-shopped (can’t even recognize some of the ladies)… the ideal “WTHeyyy” candidate!

  5. bongbabe at | | Reply

    horrible. simply horrible.

    photo shopping is SO bad. (i cant find queenie, can you?)

    posing is SO bad. (maheep kapoor!)

    this magazine is represented by rich housewives? wtf?

    1. k= at | | Reply

      maheep looks positively hilarious!!!
      Susanne looks cute in pink

  6. Food poisoned attorney at | | Reply

    Nothing collectible about this edition…!!! Yep rich celebrity wives/socialites…

  7. Shruti Malik at | | Reply

    trophy wives..

  8. kasthuri at | | Reply

    Everyone has been bought to one skin tone. This is such a horrible cover. Get over the “fair is beautiful” phase L’Officiel. Photoshopping gone overboard in this cover.

  9. diptiN at | | Reply

    what was the photographer thinking? how is it possible for all these women to have the exact same skin tone. They all look like lifeless mannequins. The worst is queenie in her , hate her outfit and pose. I do like Susanne’s dress.

  10. madhu at | | Reply

    oh god.my eye hurts big time

  11. M at | | Reply

    lol..this is hideous !! did these women see the cover before it was out or are they so deparate ?
    this should be called “the deparate housewives of tinseltown !”

    1. M at | | Reply

      oops I was so blinded..I mistypes desparate 2 times over !

  12. FashionVictim at | | Reply

    Is this the casting announcement of Real Housewives of Mumbai?? What a bizarre bunch!!

    1. Aditi at | | Reply

      HAHAHAH. best comment EVER!

    2. beehive at | | Reply

      hahaha… Good One..

  13. monika at | | Reply

    What is wrong with this magazine?This is simply so so sad!And that LV trunk on the side.Man oh man!This is so tacky!

    1. P at | | Reply

      That’s probably cos Vuitton paid for it. Like they pay for every other shoot in this silly glossy

  14. veenu at | | Reply

    Horrid! Such a sad cover.. The only one who has some semblance of normalcy is Sussane Roshan..

  15. rt at | | Reply

    ROFL…Something about this is hilariously funny…
    Samantha Nayar looks startled

  16. Iris at | | Reply

    FoE. Friends of the Editor.

    1. javajive at | | Reply

      So true- Suparna Motwane(sp!)
      is friends with them all!

  17. shwetha at | | Reply

    Real housewives of Bollywood county :)…maybe a reality show in the works ? I think the common thread between all of them is they’re all what you call Page 3.

    Classy of Twinkle & Gauri to have not stepped into this crowd.

  18. Divya at | | Reply

    The trash collector’s special.

    1. MJ at | | Reply

      Bahahah! Touche, my friend :-)

    2. Puneet at | | Reply

      Haha… why, which competition magazine do you work for????

  19. priya at | | Reply

    the theme is that they are all social wannabes who sponsored this cover. Maheep Kapoor’s pose in THAT dress looks downright VULGAR.

  20. sb at | | Reply

    its odd to see Laila’s necklace, she’s the only one wearing such a heavy neckpiece

  21. Pooja at | | Reply

    Most of these “celebrities” are actually blending into the background of the cover, thanks to their outfits and photoshopped faces…. I like the pop of yellow on Samantha nayar’s outfit.. and one small “correlation” of showing is probably 10 of these ladies is to map to their 10th anniversary!On an aside, PnP, you need to change the image title to 10th anniversary instead of 100th anniversary! :)

  22. Ashish at | | Reply

    Sad such a reputed fashion magazine internationally is rescued to this…
    They look like Mafia-wives – tacky and super photo shopped…Queenie seems to be really happy on the cover…Is Susan roshan going to beon ever single cover this month!!!

  23. Lalitha at | | Reply

    Bewildered why the magazine chose these women…Aside from Sussanne Roshan who has a vocation, the magazine should change its title to Officially Socialite. Really silly looking cover.

  24. kind at | | Reply

    only haseena looks nice

  25. fashionfaff at | | Reply

    I know what they have in common! They are all women made famous and identifiable to most of us only because of their innumerable appearances on this blog :P

  26. Myla at | | Reply

    One word: tacky.

  27. just me at | | Reply

    Theme – The Kardashian Christmas card, courtesy Indian socialites? Maheep looks like she’s holding in her breath, Queenie looks ditzy, Samantha (who?) looks startled…I could go on. Deffo a WTHeyyyyyyy!

  28. RUCHii at | | Reply

    with the look on her face it seems like something/ someone is poking the lady on the trunk (Samantha Nayar..??) :D
    ..and my eyes hurt!

  29. Sheikha at | | Reply

    Ok, so could they not find other rich housewives to feature instead of the same ol’ same ol’? Oh, wait…other rich housewives are busy being just that..rich

  30. slc at | | Reply

    Photoshopped to an extreme, where Seema Khan is unrecognizable. These women are rich, influential because of beaucoup $$. This edition is supposed to be a “collectors special” that itself is hillarious!

  31. Sabita at | | Reply

    The sad part is most of these women don’t even have concept of style and hasnt done anything to be on the cover…oh well…nothing surprising here…

  32. Hipo at | | Reply

    It looks like l official is a total “pull the strings by your pr agent kind of magazine” it was mostly in the inside, but to bring it out on the cover is blatant.

  33. Tacky at | | Reply

    Did they have to put so many on the cover, were they obligated, or was there a fee ;)

  34. Pria at | | Reply

    Is this the officially official worst dressed list. .

  35. Teresa at | | Reply

    It’s so sad that now a days newspapers, blogs and magazines feature people because of their pr agents and not because of their merits, or who they really are. Socialites of a social world. are you worth cover material? Are you worth magazine material, who sees….

  36. Radha at | | Reply

    Is this queen tacky and her bees.

  37. D at | | Reply

    haha … i agree with fashionfaff….but would like to add that haseena and susanne ..and perhaps even seema still look half decent…the rest = tacky clones of each other

  38. Mruna at | | Reply

    Common aspect = All have the same skin tone! ( via photoshop) ;p

  39. Honey at | | Reply

    Everyone’s photoshopped to the nines, and then some :x
    Embrace your wrinkles, women-of-certain-age! Whither the laugh lines gone? :|

  40. Vasundhara Goel at | | Reply

    Spare us the horror and pls dont post such pics on your blog! I love your blog, but this pic scared the hell outta me!

  41. loooollll at | | Reply

    even the photoshop is so bad >> queenies shoes are sitting on lailas… hahahhaha… l’officiel sucks!!

  42. Bellatrix at | | Reply

    The photo shopped Loser’s edition…

  43. CC at | | Reply

    The theme?
    One word: COUGARS!

  44. don at | | Reply

    no offense guys but ull are just bored people with no life commenting on how they look cause each one of ill would die to look like any of them ‘

    1. Kerat at | | Reply

      Your right. These people are bored people sitting in dark rooms, munching on chocolate and getting fat – hoping that one day they could look like these ladieeeees

Leave a Reply