31 Responses

  1. neha at | | Reply

    marie claire is aweful. her head looks completely out of proportion with the rest of her body. if you look at the picture for a couple of seconds and take in her arms and her waist, you’ll get the feeling that they have superimposed her face on someone else’s body …. and that face with those sucked in cheeks …. urghhhhhh…..

    hi blitz on the other hand makes her look wonderful

    1. girlie at | | Reply

      I am in total agreement. In the first look she doesn’t look fierce at all…in fact, she is not giving out anything. The second is lovely though at the first glance I thought it was someone else!

    2. SS at | | Reply

      Im getting sick and tired of those sucked in cheeks ..first the racoon eyes .now the sucked in cheeks…boy!…and yes..her head looks totally disproportionate and odd….she rocks the hi Blitz look though..and swooooonn on the neckpeice!!

  2. Pragati at | | Reply

    What Designer is she wearing in the Hi Blitz’s cover?

  3. Sej at | | Reply

    She looks like Cher in the picture on the left at first glimpse and it’s not to say I don’t like Cher but Kareena just looks awful here. Nothing works. The one on the right is much better though I am not a fan of the cleavage.

  4. Sindhu Gururaj at | | Reply

    Please ID the necklace…It is awesome…. in fact that is an under word!!

  5. JP at | | Reply

    not really crazy abt the marie claire cover…but in Hi blitz, simply stunning…she looks like a princess.

  6. maru at | | Reply

    Not sure how that Hi Blitz cover is attractive – Its been photshopped so much that Kareena looks like a Madame Tussuad’s statue. The Hi Blitz cover may have been photoshopped too, but the contrast is so stark that Kareena almost looks like a real person there ;)

  7. PeachBellini at | | Reply

    wow, she looks so nice in the hi blitz cover! so glad to finally see her hair and makeup done differently! I love that she doesn’t have the stark, thickly lined spider eyes that she usually does. the make up and hair are fabulous! and she is not sucking in her cheeks – hallelujah! it gives a certain innocence to her look and softens her otherwise sharp features. wish she’d look like this more often. profuse use of exclamation marks was highly warranted in this situation.

    1. Rupal at | | Reply

      agree… she looks wonders in when styled for a softer look… don’t know why she does not do that in real life…. love her on hi blitz

  8. kiran at | | Reply

    can you please post a full length pic of that lengha {if you can find one}?


  9. Fashionluvver at | | Reply

    OMG. Kareena is looking like her evil twin in marie claire. Seeta aur Geeta anyone?

    Awful styling, sticky puffed hair, horrendous make up and sucked in cheeks pout – RUN! Kareena’s coming!

    1. Shivani Kapoor at | | Reply


  10. Jasmine at | | Reply

    I just love the Hi Blitz cover…Kareena looks beautiful. OH and I cannot stop staring at that necklace!!! Do you know who the necklace is by?

  11. pdaervo at | | Reply

    I think they both look great, it’s just two different styles of photography. The only thing a bit off with the Marie Claire is her expression, but I love the big hair and bold colors. The Hi Blitz is just pretty- I want hair like that.

  12. lurverlurver at | | Reply

    i covet the make up in high blitz..can we have a breakdown?

    marie claire’s cover looks scary..she remind me of elvira..w/o the cleavage….

  13. Geeta at | | Reply

    She’s goreous in the second. I think it’s the first time I’ve seen curly hair on her. Very pretty.
    The first…well..not so much.

  14. Kiwi at | | Reply

    The Marie Claire cover makes her look Grotesque, heavily photoshopped. The Hi Blitz cover is great-have not seen her looking so feminine in a long, long time. Please publish the other photos inside, she is wearing a lovely black gown, an Anamika Khanna outfit, some lehangas and gorgeous jewellery

  15. Me at | | Reply

    It looks bad! Both of them looks horrible. If it was someone else, you all will bash them including the site admin. But ofcourse since it’s Kareena so it’s all ok. I love Kareena but sometimes I feel like this site shows favoritism to Kareena and sometimes Aish even if they look horrible.

    1. Rolie at | | Reply

      I disagree with the favoritism…the fact is that Kareena is overexposed in bollywood and the girls are covering the fashion aspect of it .
      Also, the site moderators even mentioned earlier that they were getting tired of seeing the Kapoors and Khans on mags

  16. Tanya at | | Reply

    Black nail paint on long nails is just wrong.

  17. Rolie at | | Reply

    can you post more pics form hiblitz? The cover is so beautiful, looking forward to the spread

  18. shonali at | | Reply

    i love the hi blitz cover. kareena looks timeless and elegant. hate the marie claire. it does nothing for her and makes her looks like alexis from the dynasty tv program.

  19. dia at | | Reply

    you cant be serious to say you like both avatars :S
    the marie claire cover is a desaster and in HI Blitz just the lehenga and the necklace doing it, not really Kareena herself!!!

  20. hhc-reader at | | Reply

    She looks great in the Hi-blitz cover – she looks so feminine and dewy-fresh in the soft curls. Reminds me of her make-up in Yuva, where she had soft curls. It suits her.

    1. DeLight at | | Reply

      agree.. soft curls do suit her very well!

  21. DeLight at | | Reply

    wow.. how gorgeous does she look in the Hi-Blitz cover –total fab as the bygone era princess!!

    minus the cleavage, i’d say it’s absolutely perfect!

  22. SS at | | Reply

    I love both – the Marie Claire cover is simple and understated, while the Hi! Blitz one is ethereal and lovely.

  23. Soha at | | Reply

    i like hiblitz…as you mentioned it has a princessy feel to it n its simplisity captures your eyes..while marie claire looks nothing like her *highly photoshopped*

  24. Maze at | | Reply

    They are 2 completely different styles, I like both. I envy her cheekbones!

Leave a Reply