6 Responses

  1. jnnsmpth at | | Reply

    This is not a cover worthy of any high end fashion magazine, especially vogue. Better suited for a cosmopolitan (and the like). The description and picture do not match, she looks anything but adorable. And what is the coconut leaf doing up there? Lol

  2. Kamal at | | Reply

    so photo shopped!
    and when she is perfect (body wise) to begin with.. what a shame.

  3. Asha at | | Reply

    That does not look like Jacqueline AT ALL. I am really struggling to understand how these stars allow such photos to be published. Especially when (1) they look better than the photos and (2) the photos do not look like them.

  4. Avani at | | Reply

    LOL! What is happening with the neck, boobs. Photoshop gone really bad. I will take Twinkle Khanna and her subtle edgy sweetness on a cover any day over this, doesn’t matter she acts or doesn’t act in movies anymore. :D

  5. saki at | | Reply

    way too much photoshop. does anyone know if the covergirl has any control over how their image would be used? as in, how much photoshop?
    and illusion netting is evil.

  6. DramaMama at | | Reply

    Vogue India covers are so boring. Why can’t they use models? It’s a fashion mag, after all.

Leave a Reply