24 Responses

  1. aparna at | | Reply

    i’m coming with you to gush… wow… this cover is a fashion inspiration to me… beautiful 50’s vibe….

  2. ariel001 at | | Reply

    Love it! I think JF takes the best cover shots on magazines! Remember that stunning Versace on her!?

  3. SHAB at | | Reply

    a smashing cover! great color, great background, styling and look, thumbs upppp

  4. kasthuri at | | Reply

    That doesnt look like Jacqueline at all !

  5. veenu at | | Reply

    yeah dress humka de de thakur!!! lurvvvvvvve…lurrveeeeeeee

  6. Food poisoned attorney at | | Reply

    Love the cover. Gorgeous:)

  7. Kara at | | Reply

    She doesn’t even look like herself! Enough with the Photoshop!

  8. Flier at | | Reply

    a gorgeous woman in gorgeous clothes! she does complete justice to the 60’s look !

  9. Nisha B at | | Reply

    gives me a grace kelly vibe!

  10. Mruna at | | Reply

    Love the vintage vibe!

  11. Lalitha at | | Reply

    Glad you told us it was Jacqueline since I could not recognize her at all! Head to toe LV is fine, sure, yes but this is a bad outfit, head to toe!

  12. Gunita at | | Reply

    Love it! I just cant get past those wedges!

  13. sukh at | | Reply

    WAOW!! like I thought, wishy washy colors just don’t suit this girl…she looks so striking here…. such chic and style….I’ll probably buy this magazine just for the cover….

  14. Juls at | | Reply

    She looks so lovely.

    A request for P&P – Is it possible to have next entry and previous entry on the detail pages? I like to read comments on every entry and I have to keep going back to get to other entries.

  15. just me at | | Reply

    Didn’t like the cover at all! She makes the dress look so mumsy – and will due respect to the mumsy look, just seeing it on the other model tells me that that was not the intention behind the outfit! I loved the color and loved the cut out pattern thing (I have an almost-identical skirt!) – but the cover was a let down! She’s just – you know – there, leaning at an angle, squinting into the camera. And as Kara remarked, I think she’s been PS’d so much she looks all Feroze Gujral-ish to me (not that there’s anything wrong with that!)

  16. suri at | | Reply

    She’s gorgeous, though like others I couldn’t recognize her. Her right foot looks so odd at that angle.

  17. Krk05 at | | Reply

    And why is this not ‘match much’ ?!!

    1. rB at | | Reply

      this is for a magazine cover.. so here the stylist can take the creative liberty as long as the whole picture looks gd..but not necessary that the same styling will translate well in to real life..that is why it’s not a match much here

  18. dn at | | Reply

    Very retro and so fab!

  19. AJ at | | Reply

    she looks like she’s from a 50’s print ad. not in a good way!

  20. RUCHii at | | Reply

    awesome !!

  21. R at | | Reply

    erm… that’s Jacqueline Fernandez?!?
    It’s like when my 4 year old niece drew a horse (that didn’t look remotely like a horse) and said “it’s a horse because I wrote under it, that it is one.
    Too much Photoshop, but a lovely cover.

  22. S at | | Reply

    u know, everyyyyyy thing isnt photoshop. And its a real pity every time a new kind of visual is put in front of us , we scream photoshop. But for people whose imagination is limited , photoshop is that magical wand than helps justify something they cant understand. Perhaps , its just very good hair and make up application that can often transform appearances . Point in case Oprah . Love the woman. And god bless her for being able to have herself be photographed with and without hair and make up . But really. May be if photoshop was all its cut out to be – we should apply it to our government . May be they will finally make sense. And look good in the process.

  23. narmeena at | | Reply

    omg ! seriously her head and clothes remind me of the beautiful gorgeous Lisa (bart simpsons sister ) too much photoshop that made her look like a guy posing to impress in the 50’s

Leave a Reply