39 COMMENTS

  1. I have to agree with MP. The cut of the pants is too wide at the hip/thigh area – making her look much larger on the bottom. Like the shoes though.




    0



    0
  2. I could not understand …what is there to like. The color, tone and appearance was not even worth mentioning on HHC. It is ruining your repu.




    0



    0
  3. She looks wonderful waist-up. The super wide-leg pants are a big trend but its one of those trends that you wish would pass soon. They don’t flatter anybody.
    Whats up with the pink top and red shoes??




    0



    0
  4. she looks really weird – the turtleneck doesnt go with the pants..the purse is too small for the silhoette created by the wideness of the pants – ugh she matched her top to her shoes – and added a thin gold chain belt to the pants.in addition she’s wearing dangly earrings and hair loose – too much going on if you ask me..i hate the look:-)




    0



    0
  5. i dont like those pants much.. even she couldnt carry it welll

    but what happ to Fleur X.. she used to be so fresh looking.. she looks tired and old now




    0



    0
  6. I like it, chicness!!

    kinda feel she cud have accessorized better…a necklace (short/long) would have broken up the monotonous colors…




    0



    0
  7. oh my god…dont tell me the bell bottoms are coming back!!! i’m all for fashion…but i wonder how many people can carry off high waisted/ wide leg pants?!?!?!
    nice top though.




    0



    0
  8. I like it, it’s cool and sophisticated. The trousers look like this Max & Cleo one I picked up a few days back. This look is strictly for tall and lean girls though.




    0



    0
  9. Given that its not a photoshoot, no special lighting or effects, I think she looks fantastic. Reminds me of ads for formal pants from the VS catalogue.




    0



    0
  10. i cant believe ppl are complaining about this!!! whatt??
    i love it!! she looks radiant and very very trendy! i love her entire outfit except her earrings.




    0



    0
  11. Um, does no one notice the tacky thin belt around her waist? Who wears that crap anymore? The earrings don’t match, the clutch doesn’t match, the shoes don’t match. What’s there to like about this??




    0



    0
  12. how can this outift and this girl be compared to lauren bacall and katherine hepburn ??!??!??? that’s insulting to two beautiful women who were always impeccable..




    0



    0
  13. I love it. I think tan or brown colours look great on brown-skinned people. She’s combined it very well with the other purple/crimson colour. I did feel something was missing and then on closer look realised that the sleevelength on the shirt is a little short. Her hands seem to be sticking out a little. Very chic all in all.

    Love your website.




    0



    0
  14. clingy jersey blouse is clinging in all the wrong places, tacky belt, hate the waistband of the pants (high waistband on low waisted pants?) and the bell bottoms are nasty looking.
    It may be a comfy look for going out and running errands but not something that should be held up in high esteem as ‘fashion’




    0



    0
  15. The look is strictly okay, though maybe it doesn’t quite fit at a store launch. If she’d kept the hair up in a high straight pony tail and added hoop earrings, it may have streamlined the look a bit more.




    0



    0
  16. i think she looks good. she looks better than most people on this site. for example, shehnaz in her strange dress with lajpat nagar wedges and divya dutta who looks like a mad clown dancing in her ridiculous blouse.




    0



    0
  17. The trousers are too short and ill fitting. The fabric of the top is boring, and why red shoes. Also as a model, hasnt she heard of oil free makeup?




    0



    0
  18. Its not that bad,but true the waist does look bigger then usual!This is when i say these pants dont fit all body type’s!but the colours are wonderful,they go nice to her skin colour!




    0



    0

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here