47 Responses

  1. cotton at | | Reply

    I’m surprised how come it did not get a WTHEYYY from you P&P

    1. asha at | | Reply

      me too, this is definitely A WTHEYY!!

  2. M at | | Reply

    One of the better behinds in leggings, and this coming from a completely heterosexual female.

  3. Desimom at | | Reply

    I am having this uncontrollable urge to pull together the back of that gown using 4 safety pins.

    1. swati at | | Reply

      i second that…..no matter how daring she is….this is an ultimate disgusting gown….things like these belong in trash….i litterally m breathing in a bag to overcome my urge to Puke…..

      1. tanya at | | Reply

        hahaha… hence ur not evelyn sharma….so orthodox and cliched ur think is …this is bloody brilliant, a gown with a twist… the sweet girl frm the front and rocker chic from the back. this is fashion forward …it would have been so borin seen to death if this was fully covered. i give this a thumbs up…one needs vision and the guts to wear this and eveyln u NAILED it.

        1. Myvoiceandyours at | | Reply

          This is not rocker chic…more like rocker-lost- the -plot..and then poor thing,also lost half her dress…this is like like sexy- made to stand- on it’s hind legs…kinda brazen silly.

          1. SHAB at |

            best comment

          2. Maya at |

            I second that. Best comment, indeed!

  4. FashionVictim at | | Reply

    You need a near perfect derriere and super high confidence to wear this dress and looks like Ms Sharma has both!! :)

  5. Paroma at | | Reply

    The front pics are sheer perfection. The back of the gown is terrible…why oh why would you massacre a perfectly nice gown like that?! But credit to her that she still manages to look pretty darn good!

    1. Food Poisoned Attorney at | | Reply


  6. Nisha B at | | Reply

    How come it’s not a WTHeyy??

  7. L at | | Reply


  8. Roni at | | Reply

    this is def a WTHeyyy gown…the entre gown luks ripped from the back…utter disgusting !!

  9. Sunanda at | | Reply

    Eww eww eww. WTHeyyy all the wayyy!

  10. Malaise at | | Reply

    Nice bum! Wish her pants didnt cut into her waist like that..

  11. krisha at | | Reply


  12. kasthuri at | | Reply

    WTHEYY !
    And even this female with an otherwsie awesome figure cannot pull off backside showing in leggings. Then i think almost no one else can.

  13. SY at | | Reply

    Is it just me or does anyone else see a slight ‘rip’ in her pants in the back?

    1. Phoenix at | | Reply

      That’s what I was dreading as well.. either a rip or lint or something. Gross

      1. Anu at | | Reply

        Hey, that was the 1st thing I noticed as well… I think it’s a slight ‘rip’ as well. This is just soooo awful. I wonder how anyone can like a dress like this one!

  14. clotheswhore at | | Reply

    love it!she looks amazing…she pulls it off…..

  15. Monica at | | Reply

    Ummm can I see through the front of her dress? I like the back it’s interesting but she totally wore pants two sizes small and ripped em while putting em on- unnecessary.

  16. perfumeice at | | Reply

    injust cant believe sumone like nikhil ripped off a dior haute couture gown and that too from its current season.

  17. Ash at | | Reply

    My first expression was a good laugh :) I actually like the surprise and the gown. It needs to be perfect although … U can’t have anything like a rip off

  18. Slc at | | Reply

    I’m speechless. Gown looks pretty goog from front and is ruined at the back. It’s as if they ran out of fabric, tacky

    1. Slc at | | Reply

      I meant “good”

  19. Ethnic at | | Reply

    Such a waste of such a beautiful gown and face!!

  20. Farrah at | | Reply

    i agree that her behind is of the gew who can dare to take this risk. but all risks don’t pass. and sadly, this is just stupid.

    it looks like she is constantly standing behind a bar or a curtain.

  21. nikhil thampi at | | Reply

    hahaha now this is fun. i just randomly saw this online n cldnt resist but comment…loving the fact how this garment has left an unpleasant taste in everyones mouth… to the ones who liked it…thank you so much for those kind words….and those who hated it I LOVE THEM THE MOST.

    p.s perfumeice : kinda note this garment is the no rip off of ne international brand plus this garment is 1 year 4 months old this is from my very 1st collection so that i showcased so the accusation is whimpish.

    any how we wanted to make a dramatic appearance and we surely did.
    thank u high heel and the ppl who took time out to comment.

    1. wannabe at | | Reply

      Hi Nikhil, Its very cool of you to leave a comment here and stand up for your creation. The front of the gown is very pretty. I’m not quite taken with the back but it sure is unusual and provocative. So I guess that proves your point.
      Now if only the gown came with that body I’d be the first one to buy it :)

    2. Vanaja at | | Reply

      She is so gorgeous. I liked the gown. The back is rather bold but she carries it well.

      I am surprised to see some unusual comments on this outfit. We have seen some bold back appearances by Deepika, Sophia and many others….

  22. Lola at | | Reply

    Tacky is the only word I have to describe this tragedy of a gown. This look is not happening…it is more of what happened.

  23. ROCK ON at | | Reply

    I like it, it’s unexpectedly shocking! And what a nice ass.

  24. H at | | Reply

    I think all of us have it wrong. What we have here is not a dress, it’s apron couture!
    Or a mullet dress, business in the front party in the back.
    I love when you can think of more than one funny thing to say about a ridiculously silly dress.

  25. Phoenix at | | Reply

    I like the gown. I would wear it. I think it’s pretty cool and I’m suddenly liking her more for having some guts. Hope she goes the Megan Fox route for the rest of her career (daring, in your face) otherwise she will get lost in the shadow of Dia Mirza a star who never really rose either!

  26. SS at | | Reply

    Ummm OK the back of this “gown” got a lot of attention. But did anyone notice the disaster happening in the front (2nd pic)? I can see her n***** showing! Jeez! I’m sure the Thampi guy will say that was the intention too. :D

  27. arpitha at | | Reply

    the back would have looked better if she had worn correct size atleast, and even more better had the pant been an ombre say bron & black comination one.

  28. just me at | | Reply

    Did someone call this rocker chic? All I see is a squashed butt! Methinks the rest of this oh-so-pretty gown got caught in the car door as she was alighting…so she does get a sympathy vote from me!

  29. Orange Jammies at | | Reply

    Umm, this can’t be called a ‘gown’. Half of it doesn’t exist. Time to think of another name. No ‘tacktastic’ this time, P & P? :)

    1. The Mad Momma at | | Reply

      I agree OJ. Tacky is the best I can call it. And I’m being generous.

  30. Fashionista at | | Reply

    I luv that quirky fun surprise from the back Its unexpected drama and sure got a load of brick bats from the ladies above But I liked the edge in it n she has got a superb body to show off I bet every guy’s breath was held for a moment when she passed by…. Sigh when was the last we did that?

  31. Honey at | | Reply

    Not mincing words. This is terrible.

  32. Pri at | | Reply

    I think her pants has a run…but it’s a gorgeous gown in the front…

  33. sayee at | | Reply

    it surely is WTHEyyy ……… it shud be awarded tht …… n tht boy is justifyin this outfit …….. blah!!!!!!!

  34. deemelinda at | | Reply

    isn’t the front of the gown too transparent?! can see the twins!but I guess everyone is glued to the back of the gown

Leave a Reply