59 Responses

  1. quirky at | | Reply

    PERFECT !!

  2. ms. meow at | | Reply

    She oozes SEXY in this outfit. LOVE!!! I am a straight female, but cannot stop gazing at her booootttay!

    1. ReshmaSanjeev at | | Reply

      Me too……..;-)

      1. Rushil at | | Reply

        totally! she is the sexiest actress in the industry!!

  3. fashion outsider at | | Reply

    This cover could actually pass off as Vogue worthy. Did they have a change in their graphics dept? That Genelia cover was so so tacky.

  4. pb at | | Reply

    Damn this cover rocks so much more than Aishwarya’s. Deepika’s totally owning this look.

  5. Neha at | | Reply

    Not a fan. Come on – actress in sexy dress and long tresses in pose 6 from the Modelling For Dummies guidebook. A totally obvious, expected, unsurprising cover that could’ve come from any magazine. Where’s the Vogue factor? Where’s the interest, the twist, the other-wordliness? Seriously, sometimes I wonder if Vogue India has ANY creative art direction at all.

    1. rudra at | | Reply

      totall agreee…

    2. rvc at | | Reply

      Vogue India is hardly at par with Vogue US, leave alone Paris or Italy. It’s the same boring Bollywood shtick and trite content – I mean, I’ve seen college mag covers better laid out than this. And the writing is laughable – ‘An easy way to amazing eyes’? The cover, barring DP, looks like it belongs on a Seventeen. I can not believe Priya Tanna is Emmanuelle Alt’s contemporary. Ugh.
      That Burberry dress is fantastic though.

      1. Chocolate Martini at | | Reply

        I dont understand the constant comparisons at all. I would understand comparing Vogue USA to Vogue France, Italy or Japan (or even Vogue Brazil which is young, fun and colorful) and complaining that it was not up to standards, but Vogue India?

        Let’s face it- fashion in India involves a lot of pretension, pomposity , plagiarism, kitsch and garishness and very little actual creativity or style. You only have to compare the Filmfare red carper to that of the Oscars or even Chinese/ Japanese award shows to realize that there is no comparison at all. And Bollywood does have some of the tackiest onscreen costumes anywhere in the world.

        Even the mainstream Indian media’s approach to fashion is extremely juvenile and crude mainly focusing on actresses “in skimpy bikini set to sizzle”. A lot of people in the country still have outdated moralistic attitudes towards fashion and complain about girls becoming westernized and spoilt etc

        I don’t mean to be insulting, India is obviously a developing country that is only just discovering fashion, but I just want to point out that international comparisons are futile.

        At this point I think it is just extremely impressive that India even has so many international fashion magazines: Vogue, Harper’s, Marie Claire etc. And given that they’ve working in a very new, fledgling fashion scene, I think its very impressive what they’re all doing. I’m sure we’re going to see some excellent content soon, given how fast things are evolving though.

        1. Amit at | | Reply

          See i find Elle is on it but there is no Mention of it there. Accept that Fashion still means not more then fun to India’s most of people and m sorry but even Vogue is sprdn it the wrong image just to get on top. We need something more informative something to educate people that fashion is a serious business. U kw Indian Fashion has come a long way after d independence and i totally appreciate it. But it doesn’t meen so much of repeatation which is boring and i feel fashion is anythn but not boring. These magazine’s should spread the real thing not just the bollywood. Fashion is Far far far diffrent.

      2. Neha at | | Reply

        At least its less cringe-worthy than “At Home With John Abraham”. That one’s straight out of a mid-90s Women’s Era.

      3. Kish at | | Reply

        I would not even compare Vogue US to Paris or Italy – come on, it’s one of the worst Vogues out there. When’s the last time you’ve seen a creative cover, without the face of some celebrity on it? India’s just following their footsteps – and why not? Celebrities sell. That’s what the common man will notice and buy. Why go a different direction if this is what’s paying the bills?

    3. swathi at | | Reply

      I totally agree. This cover is so Un-Vogue-ish ! I need to send a copy of the ‘ The September Issue ‘ to Vogue India to show them how much research and work goes into making a cover.

      1. Neha at | | Reply

        I know! I want an Indian Grace Coddington!

        1. amit at | | Reply

          I am here

      2. Priya at | | Reply

        I totally agree as well Vogue India totally lacks the originality and art direction…Although Deepika looks good I find this cover below normal Vogue standards ….I can see this as Cosmo cover or of some mens magazine…but it is not “Vogue”

    4. Amit at | | Reply

      Agee 100%

      1. fashion outsider at | | Reply

        Anaita Shroff Adajania has to be one of the least creative stylists around. Show me one cover, one feature, one movie where she has taken a risk?
        And their graphic design department simply sucks! That Genelia cover from December was plain tacky! I agree that some college mag covers are better. I am not a huge fan of the US edition of Vogue but this is not even on par with that!
        feels good to vent like this…

        1. Rushil at | | Reply

          ok she looks fabulous! and the cover is great! i can’t believe so many of u r so cynical about this! i mean….fashion originated in france and US has been fashion conscious since like forever!
          vogue US started in 1892! vogue india was launched in 2007! just 4 years! a HUGE gap!
          the team of vogue is doing brilliantly! they design the covers according to the indian audience! and lests be honest guys…..majority of this audience is not too fashion conscious! or into high fashion. they enjoy watching film stars! only a handful of people in india are genuinely into fashion!
          even in bollywood no 1 except sonam kapoor truly gets fashion!
          our fashion industry is still in the experiment phase and will take time to become concrete.
          and if u all know so much about fashion then why don’t u all do something about it??
          cut the guys some slack! they r all amazing and will become better with time!!

  6. Zarine Mohideen at | | Reply

    She looks gorgeous. But somehow I fell Vogue India just keep recycling the same celebrities.


  7. kumar at | | Reply

    damn girl..WORKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!

  8. Shruty at | | Reply

    What a rip off…. Take the US glamour mag cover with reese witherspoon, JAN 2011 and change the dress color and showcase the back… lo and behold you have the Vogue India cover… think fresh stylists!

    1. sreya at | | Reply

      exactly. vogue copying from glamour, (giggle… pigs do fly..)

  9. kasthuri at | | Reply

    The dress ACTUALLY make a surfing board like deepika look like she has curves !

    1. naiad at | | Reply

      Deepika a surfboard?

      dayuumm you need some coffeee

    2. anamika at | | Reply

      i agree with kasthuri.

    3. suchi at | | Reply

      she is super hot with an athletic lean frame but i agree, she is scary thin now with no real waist.

      1. naiad at | | Reply

        A woman with curves is called FAT, a lean athletic woman is called a surfboard. How exactly should (by your very high standards) an ideal woman look like?

        1. Rushil at | | Reply

          hear hear!

  10. Sasha at | | Reply

    Howw hooottt does she look!! Superb!

  11. globalchic at | | Reply

    Ok, Deepika adds major sex appeal to an erstwhile cool Burberry dress. Debating the edginess of a Vogue cover is another conversation.

    1. quirky at | | Reply


  12. MM at | | Reply

    Habba habba habba!
    Move over Kim K….

  13. Shilpa at | | Reply

    her curves look photoshopped..

  14. varsha at | | Reply

    the butt and the back kinda looks photoshopped, other than yah lov the drss the feminine pink with frills add with black leathery flaps.. add edge to the dress

  15. bongbabe at | | Reply


    hit it out of the park, deepika.

  16. monika agarwal at | | Reply

    love the curves

  17. Faiyaz at | | Reply

    This cover is AMAZING.

    It was styled by none other than Christopher Bailey himself!

  18. Chocolate Martini at | | Reply

    The cover itself looks more ladmag than haute couture to me. But who cares when Deepika’s on there looking so ridiculously HOT?

    Seriously, I think she’s one of the most beautiful women in the world. So. Damn. Jealous.

    P.S.- I know the cover is heavily airburshed and those aren’t really Deepika’s curves- she’s worryingly thin with her ribs sticking out in the Dum Maaro Dum stills. But still, she’s such a pretty, pretty girl and so charismatic. I have a total girl-crush.

    1. naiad at | | Reply

      Try checking her Kingfisher calendar picture on a sea plane wit her body at an angle to the camera and you can see she always had a great butt. and this pic did not make it to the final calendar so no it was not photoshopped! :)

      So yes they ARE Deepikas curves!

      1. naiad at | | Reply

        Oh yea to add

        also the nescafe ad (part 1) where she walks from the lift to her door

  19. Bsimple at | | Reply

    Actually this may just not be that photoshopped…if you look at her pic from KJo’s Koffee w/ Karan in that red dress where she is standing next to KJo in her red gown…she rocked that backless gown then too :) She has a seriously killer bod!

    1. Nidhi at | | Reply

      U R ABSoLuTelY right….

      1. Chocolate Martini at | | Reply

        Look at the bit where her arm meets her back: it looks like the arm socket on a barbie. Plus, her jawline is unnaturally well-defined and her skin has been whitened. Definitely photoshopped.

        Deeps has a killer bod, but no-one has curves this perfect.

        1. Nidhi at | | Reply

          Actually “BSIMPLE ” said “Actually this may just not be that photoshopped…”…hence d comment.

  20. veenu at | | Reply

    goodness gracious…didn’t know deepika could look this hot! Photoshop or no photoshop, the cover does want to make you pick up the magazine.

  21. Ratna at | | Reply

    Deepika is an amazing model. I love the dress, her pose, her face.

    Someone said that the cover isn’t special. But look at Vogue USA covers, they’re pretty obvious too. Standard posing too, especially when there are actresses on the cover. It’s the editorials that are original.

    1. ananya_s at | | Reply

      so agree!!

    2. sk at | | Reply

      i agree with ratna

  22. SS at | | Reply

    Deepika is SMOKIN HOT!

  23. swathi at | | Reply

    Not digging this cover . It suddenly took away the very essence of fashion . Think for a minute , just replace it by one of those men’s magazine titles it’ll easily pass off as one .

    Yes I do appreciate that she has a body that million girls will kill to have ! Imagine Anna Wintour looking at this cover ? Would she give an approving nod or detesting pursing of the lips ?

  24. rina at | | Reply

    Theres no denying that she looks smoking hot but this is not a cover i would expect from Vogue! I agree that it could pass off for any other magazine. But who cares. She’s hot!

  25. Maze at | | Reply

    Sorry, looks like Vogue pinched a pic from FHM or some other men’s mag and stuck it on the cover.

  26. Amit at | | Reply

    Vogue India till now 41 isuues and 4 of dem were graced by Deepika No doubts she is their fav. but too much is too much.

    1. kasthuri at | | Reply

      oh man…..they need to new models !! 4 times in one mag is really not saying much about the mag !

  27. anaita at | | Reply

    This is the real deepika!These are her curves, not a photoshopped job! Promise.

  28. Angie at | | Reply

    She looks like a video vixen…lol She’ll be in the next Pdiddy video if he sees this photo…but nice to see her mix it up!

  29. Aparna at | | Reply

    What a great dress ! and oh boy she works the hell out of it!! since Vogue has set some high standards at the past and with rest of the countries, I find this a lil meh.

Leave a Reply