Deepika: (un)Covered

Comment image 30


The latest edition of Grazia has Deepika Padukone on the cover… you like?

deepika-padukone-grazia-magazine-mcqueen.jpg

Deepika Padukone


deepika-padukone-grazia-magazine-mcqueen-1.jpg

Alexander McQueen Spring 08 (Buy)

Source

  • Like it? Share it!

30 Comments

  1. very weird picture…although the dress is stunning, it doesn’t do much for deepika…she’s a pretty girl but comes out looking average on this cover…maybe the lighting? or pose?

    Reply
  2. Love the dress and colours on the model, not Deepika. Her head looks separate from her body, and always the same blank look.. ( Why don’t fashion mags ever put smiling models on their covers? Does it undermine their “couture- ness”?)

    Reply
  3. the dress could have been photographed better.. its actually very nice.. its looks so dark and dull on deepika.. and deepika herself is not looking her pretty self

    Reply
  4. Waist up Deepika looks really really weird. Her neck/head is just odd looking in this photo and this is one of the worst pictures I’ve ever seen of her. As for the cover overall…what is up with all that junk on the cover..Posh spice in the corner for no reason whatsoever.. that stuff should be saved for the inside.

    Reply
  5. i like the dress on the model more than on deepika! i think deepika’s eye makeup is too much for the already busy dress. but thats just me.
    the colors on the magazine don’t coordinate either!
    i love her hair though! 🙂

    Reply
  6. oh my god what happeed?? shes usually looks stuning. she looks angry or upset for some strange reason hahah!!! but i loved this mcqueen dress!! i have the maxi dress version of it- gorgeous!!!

    Reply
  7. The dress is lush but its doing nothing for Deepika. And i feel as if her eyes are about to pop out.Bad Pose? Maybe? She can def do better, not one of Deepika’s best cover

    Reply
  8. She looks good and nice dress.. but that doesn’t make the cover great. The pic looks dull.. a pic of Posh on the top right and …”they told my baby i was a mons…” ..Who designs these covers??

    Reply
  9. The dress looks so classy on the model! Sheer, feminine, vibrant without being OTT. But Deepika looks soooooooo uhhhhhhhh…… almost as though she’s in a foul mood

    Reply
  10. Completely agree with others here, such a busy cover and the printed dress makes it look more messy. Although saying that the dress is nice.

    As for deepika, she looks strange, her body looks big and face small.

    Personally i think her cute smile makes her pretty, so if she’s not smiling she just looks normal.

    Reply
  11. the colours on the model are lighter. whereas deepika’s version seems darker. which on a very busy print and that dark looking cover,does her no favours. i picked up a copy of the mag thinking exactly this – that its a rather unremarkable cover for such a pretty face.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *