The Loot

46

Unless you are new to the blog (where have you been?), you know of Anu Deewan’s Birkin collection (or hoarding problem :p). So, it really should come as no surprise too see her toting yet another one. This time, a delish ostrich in purple.

anu-deewan-ihls-screening_0

Anu Deewan At IHLS Screening

Photo Credit: Viral Bhayani

46 COMMENTS

  1. Come on! This is her 8th Birkin(yes, i went through the archives). What’s the fun in buying the same design in 8 colors when you wouldn’t buy a dress in 2 colors? It’s beginning to look less like a collection and more an unhealthy obsession…at least uninspired buys.




    0



    0
  2. What is her Birkin Collection worth? I am guessing close to $100K.. Specially with the Croc Birkin she has. I really wish she would put better use to all this money she has, like help some unfortunate poor folks in the Slums of Mumbai..




    0



    0
      • Totally agree with you, Rock~n~Rose.
        Moreover, just because we don’t know what ‘other’ use they’re putting their money to, doesn’t mean there isn’t another…




        0



        0
    • I agree it is her money, earnt by her billionaire husband whose construction company provides thousands of people with jobs and livelihoods which in inself is a wonderful thing. Besides, her husband has undertaken construction projects to relocate people from slums and build them low-cost houses.

      We really can’t decide how she should spend her money orsay that she cant buy Birkins because she should be spending it on poor people.




      0



      0
      • take it easy on the social commentry luv… !!!
        who cares how much she spends on a bag?!!! or how they make their money (as long as its legal!) or how charitable they are or how many people they employ…?!
        the last few posts have been less about fashion and more about name calling (“surly goel”?!!!) and annual incomes.




        0



        0
  3. This woman looks absolutely ridiculous parading around with the same bag in 500 different colors just to show she can afford it. Someone wearing the same dress in two colors gets a WTheyy but she doesn’t?

    Too much money and too little class. What is she even doing on a fashion website? It’s so obvious she knows nothing about fashion except to just go buy whatever costs a lot.




    0



    0
  4. LMAO her and her birkins. Hey…you can take the behenji out of the country but you can’t take the country out of the behenji. This is rididulous, why not get a different bag already? Is she hell bent on getting one in every color combo possible?lol.




    0



    0
    • HAHA! I agree with the behenji comment since i have never seen her in any classy/nice/stylish outfit. Not. Once. The only time she has shown up here on this site is for her birkins.




      0



      0
  5. Cant complain about her birkin obsession.WHat’s a rich guy without some whims :P .
    I love the color of this one though.I have one in the exact color ( not a birkin…obviously ) ;)




    0



    0
  6. I love her collection.. If I could afford it, even I would buy lots of them. This is so yummy. Ha! Lets not start having socialist type of comments on this blog on how money spent on fashion can be donated. lets stick to comments on fashion




    0



    0
  7. i dont know about you all but i am bored of ‘birkin’.Please some tell her to auction it of for the underprivileged…pleaseeee!




    0



    0
  8. o my, can’t believe that i spend good 10 mins looking through archives only to find out she has way too many birkins, BV knott clutches and what not, is she seriously buying all those or just renting ? i’m not saying that she isn’t filthy rich but how come she wear her handbags / clutch/ purse only once and never repeat ,lol.




    0



    0
  9. I used to love Birkins (not that I own one – just wanted to own one). Victoria Beckham has some hundreds of them, but it never looked like she’s showing off and she somehow managed to make each of them lust-worthy.
    Anu deewan has managed to make me go totally off Birkin’s.
    She’s has managed to make THAT bag look mundane, and a show-off piece!!
    It’s like she just buys those Birkins to show that she can afford those. Seriously, I don;t even feel jealous anymore that I don;t have one!!




    0



    0
    • I think its because Victoria wears wonderful outfits and incorporates the birkin as a part of them.

      With Anu her clothes and styling are always drab and her persona is not as impressive as Victoria’s so the bag becomes the focal point of the entire outfit. Then it just looks like she’s flaunting it without any appreciation for fashion




      0



      0
      • Well said Chocolate Martini.

        All of Anu Dewans incessant flaunting has actually made me a little queasy about THE holy grail of bags! You see it on the arm of every socialite, starlet and wannabe socialite and starlet that you begin to question that “waitlist”. Actually I see the Birkin much more than any other bag, dont understand how it is all that exclusive

        Much prefer the quiet elegance of my BV




        0



        0
  10. Do they ever carry anything in those big bags? I have never seen a Birkin or any bag of that size on this site “filled out”.




    0



    0
  11. the colorless wallflower is baaaaack!! she is so blah with her expressions that she devalues just about everything she puts on. designer wear looks like nothing on her while someone like raageshwari can put on a no name skirt or blouse or an ensemble that doesn’t scream labels and look lik ea million bucks.
    that said, lovign this purple birkin, though it would look a lot better on someone like twinkle khanna or any of the other actress/ celebs like neelam kothari, maheep kapoor, seema khan, simone singh who seem to have some personality at least.




    0



    0
    • you are seriously comparing a movie actress with a regular woman?! – and yes Ms deewan is a regular woman. so she is rich… but she’s not a movie personality whose livlihood depends upon how good they look?
      that said – the birkins she carries are not even the good ones. aside from the colour there is nothing noteworthy about the bag.




      0



      0
  12. I can’t understand the beauty of ostrich leather, looks like regular leather having a bad case of adolescence acne ( sorry if that sounds yucky)

    Agree with Swati, the beauty of a bag comes through when it carries what it is supposed to, it just “falls” better, the lines of the bag come through. The birkin looks more of a travel/work bag to me and none of these ladies seem to use it that way and it looks so characterless hollow , maybe they are just too scared of spoiling it if they use it roughly and that just doesn’t give the feel of them being at ease with fashion.




    0



    0
  13. Ever since she was pregnant for the second time, she has been flaunting the exotics. first the alligator now the ostrich!

    Maybe she has the Birkin-craving during pregnancy?




    0



    0

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here